Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kebenei & another v Sawe & another (Environment and Land Case E026 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4494 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA AT KAPSABET ELCLC E026 OF 2025 DAVID KIPKORIR KEBENEI………….………………………..1ST PLAINTIFF CAROLINE AMBUYO………………………………………..2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS ANDREW KIPKEMEI SAWE……………………..…………1ST DEFENDANT THE LAND REGISTRAR, NANDI………………...……….2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. By the chamber summons application dated 17 th may 2026, the plaintiffs/applicants are seeking the following orders; a) That this Honourable court be pleased to order for substituted services of summons on the 1 st Defendant by advertisement in any of the daily newspapers. b) That costs of this application be provided for. KAPSABET ELCLC E026 OF 2025 RULING 1

page 1 of 4

2. The application is rooted on the supporting affidavit of six paragraphs sworn on even date by Lantz K Serem learned counsel for the applicants alongside the grounds, inter alia; a) That all attempts to effect service upon the 1st Defendant have failed. b) That the whereabouts of the 1st Defendant are unknown and despite all reasonable and diligent efforts the 1 st Defendant cannot be traced. c) That in the premises, it is only just fair and equitable that the Applicant’s application herein to effect service upon the Respondent be granted. 3. Mr. Victor Kiprono learned counsel for the applicants implored the court to allow the application by it nature and for the ends of justice. 4. In the foregone, is the applicant meritorious? 5. It is borne in mind that orders sought in the application are provided for under Order 5 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. Furthermore, Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya as read with section 3 of the Environment KAPSABET ELCLC E026 OF 2025 RULING 2

page 2 of 4

and Land Court Act 2015 (2011) mandate this court to grant the orders. 6. Being guided by the decision in the case Ephraim Njugu Njeru vs Justin Bedan Muturi (2006) eKLR that personal service is the ordinary way, I am satisfied from the application that service cannot be done upon the 1 st defendants/respondent through the ordinary way in this suit. 7. Accordingly, the application dated 14 th May 2026 is merited. The same is hereby allowed in terms of order number 1 for substituted service upon the defendants as stated in paragraph 1 (a) hereinabove with no orders as to costs. 8. It is so ordered. Dated and Delivered at Kapsabet this 16th day of July, 2026. HON. G M A ONGONDO JUDGE In the presence of; KAPSABET ELCLC E026 OF 2025 RULING 3

page 3 of 4

1. Mr. Victor Kiprono learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs 2. Mr. Walter Kipkorir, Court Assistant KAPSABET ELCLC E026 OF 2025 RULING 4

page 4 of 4

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.