Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Macharia & another v Muchiri (Land Originating Summons E005 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3650 (KLR)

Macharia & another v Muchiri (Land Originating Summons E005 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3650 (KLR) (15 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEELC 3650 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MURANGA LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS E005 OF 2025 MN GICHERU, J JUNE 15, 2026 BETWEEN PETER MWANGI MACHARIA ....................................................... 1ST APPLICANT ERASTUS MWANGI NJOROGE ..................................................... 2ND APPLICANT AND JONES GATE MUCHIRI .................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. This ruling is on the notice of motion dated 15-4-2026. The motion is brought under Section 3 of the Civil Procedure Act and all enabling provisions of the law seeks three (3) residual orders. 2. A restriction/restraining order be registered against L.R. No. Loc.3/Githumu/956 registered under the name of Jones Gate Muchiri. 3. The Respondent herein, his agents, servants and/or anybody claiming through or under him be restrained by way of interim injunction from building , constructing, selling and or alienating the suit pending the hearing and determination of the suit. 4. The costs of this application to be borne by the Respondent. 2. The motion is based on one ground and is supported by the afidavit of the Applicants dated 15-4-2026. The gist of the ground and the afidavit is as follows. Firstly, the suit land is in the name of Defendant. Secondly, the Plaintifis have reliable information that that the Defendant intends to sell the suit land secretly. This would defeat this suit and the ends of justice. It is therefore necessary that this motion be allowed. 3. The motion though served is unopposed because the Defendant did not file any replying afidavit or grounds of opposition. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3650/eng@2026-06-15 1

page 1 of 2

4. I have carefully considered the motion dated 15-4-2026 in its entirety. I find that on 26-3-2025, a similar application dated 29-1-2025 was allowed by consent. The current motion is therefore a repetition of the earlier one dated 29-1-2025. The motion dated 15-4-2026 is therefore dismissed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT MURANG’A THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026. M.N. GICHERU JUDGE. Delivered online in the presence of; Court Assistants – Antony Plaintifi’s Counsel –Mr. T.M. Njoroge Defendant’s Counsel – Absent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3650/eng@2026-06-15 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.