Nambiro v Land Registrar Kakamega County (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 3227 (KLR)

cancellation of the lease certificate for parcel No. Mumias Municipality Block 1/96 in the name of Solomon Watitwa Mungoni. That the said Solomon Watitwa Mungoni has declined to surrender the original certificate of lease of the suit property and that the orders sought should issue in the interests of justice. He attached the decree. 3. The application was opposed. The respondent filed grounds of opposition dated 27th January 2026. He stated that the application was an abuse of the court process and that the applicant had failed to comply with section 31 of the Land Registration Act. That the application was an afiront to the doctrine of non interference and that it was also res judicata and an attempt to review the judgment. That the decree stated inter alia that the suit property remains public land until a valid procedure for alienation is followed and anyone interested in acquiring it must follow the lawful procedure when the government lawfully disposes it. That the applicant seeks substantive orders in a miscellaneous application. Analysis and determination 4. The court has carefully considered the application and grounds of opposition. The only issue that arise for the court’s determination is whether the applicant deserves the orders sought. 5. In this matter, the applicant seeks to have title in respect of land parcel number Mumias Municipality Block 1/96 transferred to him. He argued that granting the order sought will be an enforcement of the decree of the court issued in Kakamega ELC CASE NO. 314 OF 2014. 6. The court takes the position that the application herein fails on two grounds. First, the application is based on falsehoods. The decree in Kakamega ELC CASE NO. 314 OF 2014 never stated that land parcel number Mumias Municipality Block 1/96 be transferred to the applicant. In that matter, this court stated that the said property remains public land. Secondly, section 34 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that questions on execution of decrees ought to be determined within the same suit where the decree was made and not by a separate suit. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to execute the decree issued in Kakamega ELC CASE NO.314 OF 2014 through this Miscellaneous application. 7. In the premises, the application dated 13th January 2026 lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with costs. 8. It is so ordered DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA IN OPEN COURT/VIRTUALLY THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS VIDEO CONFERENCING PLATFORM THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 A. NYUKURI JUDGE In the presence of; No appearance for the applicant Mr. Juma for the respondent Court Assistant: Delphine https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3227/eng@2026-05-25 2

page 2 of 2