Mbarak & another v Abdillahi & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E062 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 447 (KLR) (3 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEELC 447 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E062 OF 2025 FM NJOROGE, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026 BETWEEN JAMAL SALIM MBARAK & ANOTHER & ANOTHER & ANOTHER & ANOTHER ................................................................................................ APPLICANT AND YUSUF ABDILLAHI & ANOTHER & ANOTHER & ANOTHER & ANOTHER ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1 I have considered the motion dated 2nd November 2025 which seeks leave to file an application for order of committal of certain oficers named therein. The application is made ex parte but nevertheless, service was afiected on the Attorney General, according to Mr. S.M. Kimani, to gratuitously notify him of the existence of the application, and Mr. Ojwang appeared at the hearing of the said leave application on 2nd February 2026. 2 I hereby grant the application in terms of prayer number 1 thereof. The cost of the application shall abide the outcome of the committal application. The committal application shall be filed and served within 21 days from today. This file shall be marked as closed, but a copy of the order of leave granted herein shall be attached to the committal application once filed under separate cover. 3 It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI ON THIS 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026. MWANGI NJOROGE, JUDGE, ELC, MALINDI. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/447/eng@2026-02-03 1
Original judgment
Mbarak & another v Abdillahi & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E062 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 447 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.