Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Small Wonder Limited v Attorney General

Small Wonder Limited v Attorney General (Environment and Land Case 270 of 2016) [2025] KEELC 18733 (KLR) (22 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 18733 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE 270 OF 2016 EK MAKORI, J JULY 22, 2025 BETWEEN SMALL WONDER LIMITED ...................................................... DECREE HOLDER AND THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL .................. JUDGMENT DEBTOR RULING 1. Two motions are pending for the decision of this court. 2. Arising from the Motions this court reckoned that signicantly the issues raised in the motions concerns post Judgment activities where counsel who has received money on behalf of a client is not being remitted to his client. 3. There is the issue of costs fees entitled to counsel and the balance. 4. During the cause of deliberations, it was realized that there is an undisputed gure of Kshs 105,000,000/- which ought to be released to the client. Two separate orders have been issued for the release of that money Kshs 75,000,000/- (orders of 14th July 2025) and Kshs 30,000/- (orders of 17th July 2025). 5. The Court was checking the compliance stats Kshs 75,000,000/- has already been wired to the provided account and that Kshs 30,000,000/- is yet to be wired. He expressed that his client Mr. Mburu needs a month or so to wire the said monies due to “challenges” with his account. 6. Mr. Anami is of the view that already there is disobedience of the court orders in place and suggests that Mr. Mburu ought to be summoned to this court to show cause why he cannot obey the orders in place. 7. In order to provide directions for the progression of this matter, will direct: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/18733/eng@2025-07-22 1

page 1 of 2

8. i. That Mr. Mburu provides a comprehensive adavit detailing the amount he has already wired to the provided account that is Kshs 75,000,000/- ii. In the said adavit Mr. Mburu to provide reasons why Kshs 30,000,000/- cannot be wired to the account provided seeing that this is client’s money which needs to be secured in a client’s account. iii. The said information be provided on or before Monday, 28th July 2025. iv. In order to progress further the two pending applications-highlighting to happen on 28th July 2025. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MALINDI ON 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025. E. K. MAKORI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Anami for the Decree Holder. Mr. Muhuyu for the 2nd Respondent Ms Lutta for the Defendant Happy: Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/18733/eng@2025-07-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.