Mengich & 6 others v Mangich; Mengich & 11 others (Intended Interested Party) (Land Case E023 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8380 (KLR)

GLADYS JERUTO ............................................. INTENDED INTERESTED PARTY JUDITH JEBICHII ............................................ INTENDED INTERESTED PARTY DESMOND K MENGICH ................................ INTENDED INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. The Intended Interested Parties/Applicants through D.I Mengich and Company Advocates commenced an application by way of an amended notice of motion application dated 21st November 2025, seeking orders, inter alia, that the Applicants Kipleting Mengich, Desmond K. Mengich, William Mengich, Naumi Kirui, Edwin Kiptoo, Joshua Mengich, Everline Ronoh, Vioola Mareiyo, Caroline Jemutai Mareiyo, Linah Mareiyo, Gladys Jeruto and Judith Jebichii being the children of the 2nd and 3rd houses of the Defendant be joined in these proceedings as 1st and 12th interested parties. 2. The 1st Applicant’s afidavit of sixteen paragraphs and twelve grounds, are in support of the application. The Applicants’ contention in part, is that they are proper parties to this suit which proceeded under concealment of material facts from the Court yet the Plaintifis and the Applicants are the rightful parties. That it is in the interest of justice, equity and fairness that the Applicants be joined herein to enable the Court have the full representation of all afiected family members and avoid multiplicity of suits. That no prejudice will be sufiered by the Plaintifis if the Applicants are joined, whereas failure to join the Applicants will deny them the right to be heard in a matter directly touching on their family land. 3. Ms. Chesoo Learned Counsel for the Defendant/Respondent has no opposition to the application. She stated that the Court cannot close it’s eyes on the Applicants. So, she implored the Court to allow the application to pave way for the hearing of the suit. 4. Mr. Moses Rotich Learned Counsel for the Plaintifis/Respondents informed the Court that the parties are family members. That therefore, the application be allowed only on the prayer for joinder of the Applicants for the parties to attempt Court Annexed Mediation and that interim preservation orders be extended. 5. Ms. Oduor learned counsel for the Applicants stated that the Applicants are amenable to CourtAnnexed Mediation and that prayer for joinder in the application be allowed in the circumstances. 6. It has emerged that all parties including the applicants are family members. Article 45(1) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 provides; The family is the natural and fundamental unit of society and the necessary basis of social order and shall enjoy the recognition and protection of the State. 7. Plainly, the parties are in agreement that the Applicants be joined in this suit and the matter be referred to Court-Annexed Mediation in consonant with Article 159 (2) (c) of the Constitution of Kenya and the Civil Procedure (Court-Annexed Mediation) Rules 2022. 8. In the premises, the amended application dated 21st November 2025 is hereby partially allowed in terms of prayer 2 for joinder of the Applicants with no order as to costs and interim preservation orders extended. 9. Moreover, this matter is referred to Court-Annexed Mediation for a report to be filed in court for consideration and mention before the Deputy Registrar of this Court on 14th January 2026. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8380/eng@2025-12-01 2

page 2 of 3

10. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KAPSABET THIS 1ST DECEMBER, 2025 HON. G M A ONGONDO JUDGE In the presence of; Mr. Moses Rotich Learned Counsel for the Plaintifis/Respondents Ms. Chesoo Learned Counsel for the Defendant/Respondent Ms. Oduor instructed by Metto Learned Counsel for the Applicants/Interested Parties Walter, Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8380/eng@2025-12-01 3

page 3 of 3