Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ndubi v Kirimi & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal E059 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8005 (KLR)

Ndubi v Kirimi & 3 others (Environment and Land Appeal E059 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8005 (KLR) (19 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 8005 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND APPEAL E059 OF 2025 BM EBOSO, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025 BETWEEN DAVID NDUBI ......................................................................................... APPELLANT AND AARON KIRIMI ............................................................................ 1ST RESPONDENT GEOFFREY MURIUKI MANENE .............................................. 2ND RESPONDENT LAND REGISTRAR, IMENTI NORTH .................................... 3RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL ............................................................... 4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. This appeal challenges the ruling of the Senior Resident Magistrate Court at Nkubu, rendered on 31/7/2025 in Nkubu SPMC E & L Case No. E056 of 2021. It was lodged vide a memorandum of appeal dated 5/8/2025. 2. The appellant has filed a notice of withdrawal dated 13/11/2025, withdrawing the appeal in its entirety. Counsel has submitted that they had not served the appeal papers. 3. In the circumstances, the request is granted and this appeal is marked “Withdrawn with no order as to costs”. The file shall be closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 B M EBOSO ELC JUDGE In the presence of: Mr Omari for the Appellant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8005/eng@2025-11-19 1

page 1 of 2

Respondents - Absent Court Assistant – Mr E. Tupet https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8005/eng@2025-11-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.