Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kimathi & 2 others v Makathimo alias Itangata Makathimo (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E047 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7624 (KLR)

Kimathi & 2 others v Makathimo alias Itangata Makathimo (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E047 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7624 (KLR) (22 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 7624 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MISCELLANEOUS CASE E047 OF 2024 BM EBOSO, J OCTOBER 22, 2025 BETWEEN GRACE KATHURE KIMATHI ........................................................ 1ST APPLICANT PRISCILLA MWARANIA NTHUKU ............................................. 2ND APPLICANT FELICITY MAKATHIMO KAIGONGI .......................................... 3RD APPLICANT AND FRANCIS MBURU MAKATHIMO ALIAS ITANGATA MAKATHIMO ...................................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. Before court for ruling is the notice of motion dated 23/9/2025. Through it, the applicants initially sought to be allowed to settle the taxed costs in monthly instalments of Kshs 10,000/=. 2. At the hearing of the application, the proposal was adjusted to: (i) Kshs.40,000 payable on or before 24/10/2025; (ii) Kshs 20,000 payable in November 2025; (iii) Kshs 15,000 payable in December 2025; and (iv) the balance to be paid in January 2026. 3. The respondent opposed the application principally on the ground that, not too long ago, the applicants were awarded costs of Kshs 119,395 against the respondent in a difierent case and they declined the respondent’s ofier for a set-ofi. Counsel insists on two instalments. In her rejoinder, counsel for the applicants argued that the said costs were settled in three monthly instalments. 4. The court has considered the application. There are no convoluted legal issues in the matter. The applicants have asked to settle the award in instalments. Taking the proposal and the counter-proposal into account, and considering that the applicants received costs from the respondents not too long ago, the court comes to the view that the following three instalments will be reasonable and accommodative: (i) Kshs 40,000 to be paid on or before 24/10/2025. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7624/eng@2025-10-22 1

page 1 of 2

5. (ii) One half of the balance to be paid or before 24/11/2025. (iii) The balance to be paid on or before 24/12/2025. In addition, the applicants shall pay costs of the present application, assessed at Kshs. 10,000. The said costs shall be paid alongside the last instalment. It is so ordered. In default of compliance, execution shall issue. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 B M EBOSO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7624/eng@2025-10-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.