Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Maingi v Commissioner for Cooperatives (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E049 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 6974 (KLR)

Maingi v Commissioner for Cooperatives (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E049 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 6974 (KLR) (14 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 6974 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MISCELLANEOUS CASE E049 OF 2025 BM EBOSO, J OCTOBER 14, 2025 BETWEEN DAVID KINYUA MAINGI ...................................................................... APPLICANT AND COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATIVES ....................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. Vide the notice of motion dated 1/10/2025, the applicant sought, inter alia, an order directing the Commissioner of Cooperatives to appoint a liquidator in relation to an unnamed organization, to facilitate enforcement of the judgment and decree in Meru ELC Case No 73 of 2015. When the matter came before court on a certificate of urgency, the court directed the applicant to serve the application and attend court today to address it on the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court on the issue of appointment of a liquidator. 2. The applicant has attended court through counsel and has applied to withdraw the suit so that he can pursue enforcement on the platform of the case in which the judgment and decree were issued. The plea has been made at an ex-parte stage. 3. In the absence of any opposition, the oral plea to withdraw the suit is allowed. The suit is marked “withdrawn with no order as to costs.” The file is marked “closed.” DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 B M EBOSO [MR] ELC JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6974/eng@2025-10-14 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.