Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Deputy County Commissioner Tigania Central & 2 others; Kobia (Interested Party); Nabea & another (Ex parte Applicants) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E012 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 6935 (KLR)

Republic v Deputy County Commissioner Tigania Central & 2 others; Kobia (Interested Party); Nabea & another (Ex parte Applicants) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E012 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 6935 (KLR) (14 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 6935 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND JUDICIAL REVIEW CASE E012 OF 2025 BM EBOSO, J OCTOBER 14, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER TIGANIA CENTRAL .... 1ST RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER TIGANIA CENTRAL/ EAST ................................................................................................ 2ND RESPONDENT THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE LAW OFFICE ... 3RD RESPONDENT AND JAMES KOBIA .......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY AND MOSES MUTIGA NABEA .................................................. EX PARTE APPLICANT NAAMA MUNYUA NABEA .............................................. EX PARTE APPLICANT RULING 1. The ex-parte applicant has made an oral application seeking to withdraw this judicial review case in its entirely. The respondents and the interested party do not oppose the plea to withdraw the suit. They, however, insist that they should be awarded costs because they had already responded to the judicial review motion. 2. The general principle on costs in a civil case is contained in Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, which provides that costs follow the event. In the present cause, the respondents and the interested https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6935/eng@2025-10-14 1

page 1 of 2

party were served and they filed their responses to the suit. They engaged the services of counsel. In the circumstances, there is no proper basis for departing from the general principle – that costs follow the suit. 3. Consequently, this suit is marked withdrawn and the ex-parte applicant is decreed to bear costs of the suit. It is so ordered DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 B M EBOSO [MR] ELC JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6935/eng@2025-10-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.