Korir v Barmalel & 3 others (Environment and Land Case E005 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 6445 (KLR)

iii. That the said Leah Chepkirui Barmalel in conjunction with the 2nd intended 3rd party the Land Registrar Kilgoris, unlawfully transferrd and subdivided the said property to herself excluding her children who were beneficiaries and sold 90% of the Estate. iv. That it is necessary to join Leah Chepkirui Barmalel and Land Registrar as third parties to determine liability and the defendants claim of indemnity. 5. The application was brought under the provisions of order/Rule 14 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules. 6. A draft 3rd party Notice was annexed to the supporting afidavit in support of the Application sworn by Enock Kipkorir Barmalel, in which claim of indemnity was made against the first intended 3rd party for any amount which may be adjudged against the defendants in favour of the plaintifi. 7. As against the 2nd intended third party, the claim made was the failure to verify ownership, illegal subdivision and registration and failure to maintain proper records. Equally a certificate of Grant in relation to the Estate of Paul Tamason Barmalel in succession Cause NO. 2/1998 before the High Court at Eldoret was annexed to the supporting afidavit. 8. Mr. Nyamari learned counsel for the Defendants/Applicants argued the application; on 30.06.2025. 9. Upon consideration of the Application, the afidavit and submissions, upon also consideration of the applicable law, Order 1 Rule 14 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules allows for issuance of a 3rd party Notice, if a Defendant claims contribution or indemnity from a party not already in the suit. 10. Paragraph 6 and 12 of the Defendants’ Amended Defence, alleged the fraud pleaded in the 3rd party Notice, and give Notice of the intentions to issue 3rd party Notice to the Administrators of the Estate of the late Paul Tamason Barmalel, who in the certificate of Grant annexed to the supporting afidavit is the first intended 3rd party. 11. In their Amended defence and counter-claim, the Defendants now plaintifi introduce Leah Chepkurui Barmalel as the 1st Defendant and the Land Registrar as the 3rd Defendant. 12. The said Amendments were made on 3rd November 2023, and the Amended defence and counterclaim sought reliefs against Leah Chepkurui Barmalel and the Land Registrars who are already parties to the suit. 13. The issuance of the 3rd party Notice vide this application is not therefore necessary since the counterclaim has already introduce the 3rd party as defendants in the suit. 14. It follows therefrom that the application as filed ofiends Order 15 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, as it seeks to issue a 3rd party Notice, to a party already in the suit by way of counter-claim and it therefore lacks merit and the same is hereby dismissed. 15. Costs in the cause. DATED AT KILGORIS THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. HON. M.N MWANYALE JUDGE In the presence of CA – Emmanuel/Sylvia/Sandra https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6445/eng@2025-09-30 2

page 2 of 3

Mr. Nyamari for the Defendant/Applicant Mr. Rana for the 3rd Defendant in the counter-claim Mr. Rono for the Plaintifi https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6445/eng@2025-09-30 3

page 3 of 3