Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mereka & Company Advocates v Nicola Farm Limited (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E031 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 4873 (KLR)

Mereka & Company Advocates v Nicola Farm Limited (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E031 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 4873 (KLR) (1 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 4873 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MURANGA ENVIRONMENT & LAND MISCELLANEOUS CASE E031 OF 2022 MN GICHERU, J JULY 1, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADVOCATES ACT CAP 16 (LAWS OF KENYA) AND NICOLA FARM LIMITED…………………………………….CLIENT/RESPONDENT AND IN THE MATTER OF COSTS BETWEEN MEREKA & COMPANY ADVOCATES ................................................ APPLICANT AND NICOLA FARM LIMITED ................................................................. RESPONDENT (ARISING FROM ARBITRATION BETWEEN NICOLA FARM LIMITED VS SUMMER MEADOWS LTD) RULING 1. 2. This ruling is on the notice of motion dated 15-4-2024. The motion which is by the Applicant seeks three(3) orders. 1. That the Court be pleased to enter Judgment for the amount of Kshs. 6,839,700/= in terms of the certificate of taxation dated 4-4-2024 together with interest at 14% from the said date. 2. That pursuant to the judgment, a decree be issued for enforcement/execution. 3. That the costs of this application be in the cause. The motion is based on five(5) grounds and is supported by an afidavit of the Applicant dated 15-4-2024. In summary the Applicant states as follows. Firstly, the Applicant filed a bill of costs dated https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4873/eng@2025-07-01 1

page 1 of 2

3-11-2022 seeking Kshs. 43,197,000/= as costs. Secondly, on 24-1-2024, the bill of costs was taxed at Kshs. 6,839,700/= by the Deputy Registrar in favour of the Applicant. Thirdly, there was no stay granted and the Respondent has not filed a reference. Fourthly, the certificate of costs dated 4-4-2024 has not been set aside and or reviewed. Finally, the Respondent has failed and or neglected to pay the said costs despite repeated reminders. For the above stated reasons, the Applicant pray for the orders as above. 3. Even though the Respondent’s Counsel had committed, on 26-5-2025, to file written submissions within 14 days, no submissions have been filed by 27-6-2025. 4. Having considered the Motion dated April 15, 2024 in its entirety and finding that it is fair, just and unopposed, I find that it has merit and I allow it as drawn. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT MURANG’A THIS 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025. M.N. GICHERU JUDGE. Delivered online in the presence of; Court Assistant – Mwangi Njonjo Applicant’s Counsel – Miss Wambui h/b Respondent’s Counsel – Mr Musumba https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/4873/eng@2025-07-01 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.