Saina & 2 others (As Administrators of the Estate of Kipsaina Tarus alias Kipsaina arap Rarus alias Kipsaina s/o Tarus (Deceased)) v Bundotich (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E034 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 3786 (KLR) (7 May 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 3786 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KAPSABET ENVIROMENTAL AND LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS E034 OF 2022 GMA ONGONDO, J MAY 7, 2025 BETWEEN MIKE KIPNGETICH SAINA .............................................................. 1ST PLAINTIFF SAINAH KIPLAGAT ELIJAH ............................................................ 2ND PLAINTIFF HOSEA KIPROP SAINA .................................................................... 3RD PLAINTIFF AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF KIPSAINA TARUS ALIAS KIPSAINA ARAP RARUS ALIAS KIPSAINA S/O TARUS (DECEASED) AND MARITIM ARAP BUNDOTICH ...................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The plaintifis’ counsel, Mr Kipkosigei Choge has sought to withdraw the present suit on the basis that the grant in respect of the Estate of Kipsaina Tarus alias Kipsaina Arap Tarus alias Kipsaina s/o TarusDeceased, was revoked hence, an impact on the claim herein. 2. The suit was generated by way of an originating summons dated 9th November 2022 for orders as follows; a. That this Honourable Court declares that the Registered Proprietor’s Interest, his Succession in title, presumed Administrators of the Estate of the registered proprietor, or whomsoever claiming through him that may be and or may have been registered as the Proprietor of the whole Nandi/Sigot/47 occupied, possessed and used by the Applicants, be extinguished. (b) That the Honourable Court be pleased further to order and direct that the whole Suit Land Nandi /Sigot/47 be vested on the Applicants ((as Administrators of the Estate of Kipsaina Tarus alias Kipsaina Arap Tarus alias Kipsaina s/o Tarus – Deceased). https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3786/eng@2025-05-07 1
page 1 of 2
3. The plaintifi has the right to withdrawal the suit and the court has the discretion to allow it; see Beijing Industrial Designing & Researching Institute-vs-Lagoon Development Ltd (2015) eKLR. 4. Notably, the withdrawal of suit is itself it’s end as observed in Priscilla Nyambura Njue-vs-Geovhem Middle East Ltd, Kenya Bureau of Standards (Interested party) (2021) eKLR. 5. It is thus, the finding of the court that the application for withdrawal of the instant suit is merited. 6. A fortiori, this suit is hereby marked as withdrawn with no order of costs. 7. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KAPSABET THIS 7TH DAY OF MAY 2025. G M A ONGONDO JUDGE PRESENT; Mr K . Choge learned counsel for the plaintifi Walter, court assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3786/eng@2025-05-07 2
page 2 of 2