Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lagat & another v Cheruiyot (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 3568 (KLR)

Lagat & another v Cheruiyot (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 3568 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 3568 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KAPSABET ENVIRONMENT & LAND MISCELLANEOUS CASE E001 OF 2025 GMA ONGONDO, J MAY 6, 2025 BETWEEN PAUL LAGAT ...................................................................................... 1ST APPLICANT RODHA LAGAT ................................................................................ 2ND APPLICANT AND ROSALINE JEPTUM CHERUIYOT .................................................. RESPONDENT RULING 1. By the Notice of Motion application dated 13th January 2025, the applicants through Lagat Joshua and Company Advocates are seeking the following principal order that this Honourable Court be pleased to call into this Honourable Court, Kapsabet Chief Magistrate’s court Land Case number E020 of 2023 for purpose of transferring the same to this Honourable Court for hearing and determination. 2. The application is founded upon grounds which include; (a) The Plaintifi instituted the suit herein before Kapsabet Chief Magistrate Court as Land case number 20 of 2023 seeking eviction of the applicants herein. (b) During the pendency of the said proceedings the Court of Appeal in Nairobi Civil Appeal number E141 of 2022 rendered a judgment to the efiect that issues adverse possession is the preserve of Environment and Land Court. (c) It is apparent that Kapsabet Chief Magistrate court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the counter claim in the said suit as currently constituted. 3. Mr Lagat learned counsel for the applicants has implored the court to allow the application. 4. Mr Tarigo learned counsel for the respondent has no opposition to the application. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3568/eng@2025-05-06 1

page 1 of 2

5. Having considered the entire application and subscribing to the Court of Appeal decision in Sugawara v Kiruti (Sued in her capacity as the administratrix of the Estate of Mutarakwa Kiruti Lepaso alias Mutarakwa Kiruti Lepaso alias Mutaragwa Kiroti Leposo and in her own Capacity & 3 others (2024) eKLR on jurisdiction over adverse possession claims and the Supreme Court of Kenya decision in the case of Republic v Karisa Chengo & 2 others (2017) eKLR on jurisdiction generally, I find the application steadfast and merited. 6. In the upshot, the application is hereby allowed in terms of order 3 sought in the application as stated in paragraph 1 hereinabove and the application in entirety is disposed of accordingly. 7. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KAPSABET THIS 6TH DAY OF MAY 2025. G M A ONGONDO JUDGE Present; Mr Lagat learned counsel for the applicants Mr Tarigo learned counsel for the reespondent Mr Walter Kipkorir, court assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/3568/eng@2025-05-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.