Kimani v Kimani (Environment and Land Case 85 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 436 (KLR) (30 January 2025) (Directions) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 436 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAKURU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE 85 OF 2018 A OMBWAYO, J JANUARY 30, 2025 BETWEEN ANDREW KIMANI ................................................................................. APPLICANT AND WANJIKU ERIKANA KIMANI ......................................................... RESPONDENT DIRECTIONS 1. I have perused the application dated 8th October 2024 together with the filed documents and do find that the same has not been served upon Kirera and Company Advocates the advocate on record for the decree holder. The purpose of order 9 rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 is to ensure that there would be no change of advocate after judgment unless the advocate on record consents or leave of the court is obtained. Leave of the court cannot be obtained unless the advocate on record is heard. The applicant herein has not served the advocate on record and therefore the application cannot be entertained. 2. I do order that the firm of Kirera and company advocates be served with the application within the next 5 days of these direction. 3. Failure to serve within 5 days the application is dismissed with costs. Upon service hearing on 27th February 2025. SIGNED BY: HON. JUSTICE ANTONY O. OMBWAYO THE JUDICIARY OF KENYA. NAKURU ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT DATE: 2025-01-30 04:05:44 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/436/eng@2025-01-30 1
Original judgment
Kimani v Kimani (Environment and Land Case 85 of 2018) (30 January 2025) (Directions) [2025] KEELC 436 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.