Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Sendi & 2 others v Machera & another

Sendi & 2 others v Machera & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 566 of 2017) [2024] KEELC 14230 (KLR) (19 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 14230 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MIGORI ENVIROMENTAL AND LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS 566 OF 2017 GMA ONGONDO, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024 BETWEEN ITEMBE SENDI ........................................................................................ APPELLANT AND PAUL MARWA ITEMBE ................................................................... 1ST APPLICANT NKIRU MARWA ITEMBE ............................................................... 2ND APPLICANT AND ROBI MWITA MACHERA ........................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT SOFIA MOGOSI GIBOMA ........................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. This ruling is in respect of order number (iii) sought in the application by way of a Notice of motion 28th May 2024 and the order reads; ‘That there be a stay of execution of the decree touching on LR No. Bukira/ Buhiringera/472, 473, 469 and 915(The suit parcels of land) and all consequential orders emanating from the decree pending the hearing and determination of this application inter partes.’ 2. Mr B Singei learned counsel for the applicant urged the court to grant the aforementioned prayer, in the interim, to preserve the suit parcels of land awaiting typed proceedings for the disposal of the entire application. 3. Mr Achola learned counsel for the respondent/plainti opposed the application. He stated that the stay order sought is the subject of the respondent’s application dated 2nd June 2024. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14230/eng@2024-11-19 1

page 1 of 2

4. The applicant’s submissions dated 30th July 2014 are in support the application. 5. The plainti/respondents’ submissions dated 11th September 2024 reinforce opposition to the application. 6. So, is there merit in order number (iii) sought in the application? 7. Notably, stay of execution of the court’s decree dated 27th April 2023 is order number (iv) sought in the application. 8. The application is yet to be determined awaiting typed proceedings which are form the subject of prayer number (v) in the application. 9. This court is mandated under section 13 (7) (a) of the ELC Act 2015 (2011) to grant interim preservation orders. Prayer number (iii) in the application is such an order. 10. In the circumstances, the application is merited. 11. In the result, prayer number (iii) in the application, is hereby allowed accordingly. 12. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT MIGORI THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 G M A ONGONDO JUDGE Present; Mr Achola for the plaintis/respondents Mr Singei learned counsel for the defendants/applicants Tom Maurice, court assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14230/eng@2024-11-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.