Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Oloo v Ojwang

Oloo v Ojwang (Environment and Land Appeal E005 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 14212 (KLR) (3 July 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 14212 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MIGORI ENVIRONMENT AND LAND APPEAL E005 OF 2024 GMA ONGONDO, J JULY 3, 2024 BETWEEN MAURICE OUMA OLOO ...................................................................... APPELLANT AND ROSE OKEYO OJWANG ..................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. By a Notice of Motion application dated 25th March 2024, the plainti/applicant, Maurice Ouma Oloo through Tom Mboya and Company Advocates is seeking, inter alia, leave be granted to the rm of Tom Mboya and Company Advocates to enter on record for the plainti/applicant instead of Ogwe and Associates Advocates and status quo prevailing over the suit land reference number Kamagambo/ Kanyajuok/454 be maintained by the parties pending the hearing and determination of this appeal. 2. The respondent represented by G.S Okoth and Company Advocates and opposed the application by her replying adavit sworn on 15th June 2024. She averred in part that there be an inhibition of the suit land pending the hearing and determination of this appeal. 3. The respondent was duly served for today’s mention vide an adavit of service sworn on 24th June 2024. The respondent and counsel are absent without any reason. 4. Mr. Sigei instructed by Tom Mboya learned counsel for the plainti/applicant has urged the court to grant leave and status quo orders sought in the application. 5. This court is guided by Articles 48, 50 (1) and 159 (2) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, sections 3 and 13 (7) (a) of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015 (2011) and the Court of Appeal decision in the case of Ogada-vs-Mollin (2009) KLR 620. 6. In the premises, I nd it is common ground that interim preservation orders would be necessary herein. The application merited. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14212/eng@2024-07-03 1

page 1 of 2

7. Thus, the application is hereby allowed in terms of orders 2 and 4 sought therein as stated in paragraph 1 hereinabove. In particular, the parties shall not subdivide, transfer, sell, develop or in any other manner dispose of the suit land pending the outcome of this appeal. 8. The appeal is set for mention on 25th September 2024. 9. The respondent be served accordingly. 10. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT HOMA BAY THIS 3RD DAY OF JULY 2024 G. M. A ONGONDO JUDGE Present; B.S ingei instructed by Tom Mboya learned counsel for the appellant/applicant T. Luanga court assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14212/eng@2024-07-03 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.