Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Okoth v Okello; Achilles

Okoth v Okello; Achilles (Interested Party) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 33 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 14203 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 14203 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOMA BAY ENVIROMENTAL AND LAND ORIGINATING SUMMONS 33 OF 2021 GMA ONGONDO, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024 BETWEEN AGUBATUS OGALO OKOTH .................................................................. PLAINTIFF AND LAWRENCE MORTY OPIYO OKELLO ............................................. DEFENDANT AND COLLINS OMONDI ACHILLES ............................................ INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. Learned Counsel for the plainti, learned counsel for the defendant and the 1st interested party have drawn the attention of this court to a draft consent dated 26th January 2023 and duly led herein. 2. The consent reads: a. That the defendant shall transfer a portion of land parcel known as Lr.no.kabuoch/K/K/ Karita/755 measuring 2.9 Acres only without any additional claim to the Plainti at the Plainti’s cost. b. That the defendant shall within 7 days of recording this consent, execute all the necessary documents including transfer forms, consent forms, mutations and any other document and/ or form required for successful and eective transfer of 2.9 Acres of parcel of land parcel as LR.NO.Kabuoch/K/K/Karita/755. c. That the defendant shall within 7 days of recording of this consent, surrender to the Plainti’s Advocates copies of KRA Pin Certicate, National Identication /Document (ID), 3 coloured passport size photos and original Titled Deed of land parcel LR.No.Kabuoch/K/ K/Karita/755 which is the subject of transfer. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14203/eng@2024-11-14 1

page 1 of 2

d. That upon compliance with the terms of the consent at paragraphs 2 and 3, the plainti shall remove the restriction that was registered in the Land parcel NO. Kabuoch/K/K/Karita/755 immediately. e. That upon the removal of restriction referred to in paragraph 4 above, the interested parties shall be at liberty to transfer their own portions. (f) That should the defendant fail to comply with the above terms of the consent; the plainti will be at liberty proceed with the hearing from where it stopped. 3. The plainti, Agubatus Ogola Okoth and his counsel, V. Migai as well as the defendant, Lawrence Morty Opiyo Okello and his counsel, Ms. Ochieng instructed by the rm of H. Obach and partners advocates as well as the 1st interested party, Collins Omondi Achilles in person, have armed the consent. 4. In that regard, the consent in it’s entirety is adopted accordingly. 5. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT HOMA-BAY THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 G.M.A ONG’ONDO JUDGE Present: 1. V. Migai, learned counsel for the plainti. 2. Ms. Ochieng, learned counsel for the defendant 3. 1st interested party, present in person. 4. Luanga, Court Assistant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14203/eng@2024-11-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.