Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Divisi v Mambili

Divisi v Mambili (Environment & Land Case 191 of 2013) [2024] KEELC 14002 (KLR) (16 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 14002 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KAKAMEGA ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 191 OF 2013 DO OHUNGO, J DECEMBER 16, 2024 BETWEEN ALFRED AKHISERO DIVISI ................................................................... PLAINTIFF AND CHARLES MAMBILI ............................................................................. DEFENDANT RULING 1. Judgment was delivered in this matter by N.A. Matheka, J. on 24th July 2019 as follows: I nd that the plainti has proved his case on a balance of probabilities and I grant the following orders; 1. The defendant is to open the access road to the plainti’s land L.R. Kakamega/Virembe/255 as surveyed by the government and in default the land Registrar Kakamega and The District Surveyor Kakamega do visit L.R. Kakamega/Virembe/255 and L.R. Kakamega/Virembe/256 and survey the same and open the access road to the plainti’s land L.R. Kakamega/ Virembe/255. 2. Costs to the plainti. 2. Subsequently, the Plainti moved the Court through Amended Notice of Motion dated 10th February 2023, whereupon the Court made orders on 27th February 2023 mandating the OCS Shisasari Police Station and the Chief of Virembe Location to provide security to the Land Registrar Kakamega and the District Surveyor Kakamega to enable them to open the access road as ordered in the judgement. Counsel for the Plainti later informed the court on 25th October 2023 that the survey was carried out. 3. The Plainti has now approached the Court through Notice of Motion dated 4th July 2024, which is the subject of this ruling. The following orders are sought in the application: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14002/eng@2024-12-16 1

page 1 of 3

1. That this application be heard on priority basis. 2. That an eviction order be issued against the defendant/respondent herein from the access road to the applicant’s home as per the County Land Registrar/Surveyor’s Report dated 8th September, 2023. 3. That all the materials, trees, buildings, crops and any other obstructive materials on the said access road be removed. 4. That the OCS, Shinyalu/Shisasari Police Station be mandated to provide security during the exercise of eviction, and removal of all materials on the access road. 5. That the respondent bear all the costs. 4. The application is based on the grounds stated on its face and is supported by an adavit sworn by the Plainti. He deposed that the County Surveyor conducted a survey and led a survey report dated 8th September 2023 and that the Defendant had refused to honour the report despite a demand being served on him. He urged the Court to grant the orders sought in the application. 5. Although evidence of service upon him was availed, the Defendant did not respond to the application. Counsel for the Plainti urged the Court to grant the orders sought. 6. I have considered the application, the supporting adavit and the submissions. The Plainti is a successful litigant with a decree in his favour, requiring the Defendant to open the access road to the Plainti’s land parcel number Kakamega/Virembe/255 and in default the Land Registrar Kakamega and the District Surveyor Kakamega to visit parcels number Kakamega/Virembe/255 and Kakamega/ Virembe/256 and open the access road. The Plainti has annexed a copy of the surveyor’s report dated 8th September 2023. A perusal of the report shows that the surveyor visited the site on 7th September 2023 and established that the Defendant has a building blocking the access road. The surveyor prepared and annexed a sketch to illustrate his ndings. Additionally, the Plainti annexed a copy of a demand letter dated 6th November 2023 requiring the Defendant to remove the oending building. 7. I nd merit in the application, and I will allow it in a modied form, with a view to aligning it with the judgment of the Court. Further, the Court is keen to ensure that the Defendant is personally served and given another opportunity to comply, before forceful action is taken. 8. In the circumstances, I make the following orders: a. The Defendant to open the access road to the Plainti’s parcel number Kakamega/ Virembe/255 and to remove his building blocking the said access road, as identied in the County Land Surveyor’s Report dated 8th September 2023, within 30 (Thirty) days of service of these orders upon him. b. In default, the Plainti shall be at liberty to remove the Defendant’s aforesaid building. c. The OCS Shinyalu/Shisasari Police Station to provide security during the exercise of removal of the building. d. Costs of the application are awarded to the Plainti. e. The service referred to in (a) above to be eected in the presence of the Area Chief and an adavit verifying the service be led in this Court within 7 (Seven) days of the service. DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14002/eng@2024-12-16 2

page 2 of 3

D. O. OHUNGO JUDGE Delivered in open court in the presence of: Mr Mutoka for the Plainti No appearance for the Defendant Court Assistant: M Nguyayi https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/14002/eng@2024-12-16 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.