Chaudhry v Tsuma & 25 others; Charo & 16 others (Proposed Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E22 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 13648 (KLR) (9 December 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13648 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI ENVIRONMENT AND LAND CASE CIVIL SUIT E22 OF 2023 FM NJOROGE, J DECEMBER 9, 2024 BETWEEN SHABBIR AHMED CHAUDHRY ............................................................ PLAINTIFF AND KATANA CHARO TSUMA & 25 OTHERS & 25 OTHERS & 25 OTHERS ................................................................................................ RESPONDENT AND FURAHA KATANA CHARO & 16 OTHERS & 16 OTHERS & 16 OTHERS ............................................................. PROPOSED INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1 The applicants in the motion dated 27/9/2024 are the proposed interested parties. They seek to be joined in the proceedings as substantive parties as defendants. Their case is that they reside on the suit premises yet they were left out of the suit and they may need le a separate suit if not joined to this suit. They state that they would be prejudiced if they are not joined to the suit. The application is unopposed. However, upon perusing the said application this court nd no evidence attached thereto to demonstrate that the applicants have any interest in the suit property or would be aected by orders made in the matter, and the application has thus not attained the threshold required to warrant the joinder sought, and it is hereby struck out with no orders as to costs. RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ON THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. MWANGI NJOROGE JUDGE, ELC, MALINDI. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13648/eng@2024-12-09 1
Original judgment
Chaudhry v Tsuma & 25 others; Charo & 16 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.