Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mugumo v Kingi & 2 others

Mugumo v Kingi & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 10 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 13546 (KLR) (22 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13546 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NANYUKI ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 10 OF 2021 AK BOR, J NOVEMBER 22, 2024 BETWEEN JOSEPH KINYUA MUGUMO .................................................................. PLAINTIFF AND MARGARET MUTHONI KINGI ................................................... 1ST DEFENDANT LAND REGISTRAR, LAIKIPIA COUNTY ................................. 2ND DEFENDANT THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL ............................................. 3RD DEFENDANT RULING 1. The Plainti led the application dated 24/7/2024 seeking to have the County Land Surveyor provided security to ensure the peaceful re-establishment of the boundaries for the land known as Laikipia/Nanyuki West Timau Block 2/618 (Matanya Marura) (the suit property) by the OCS Matanya Police Station. The application was made on the ground that this court delivered its judgment in favour of the Plainti on 6/6/2022 who now holds the title over the suit property in trust for the beneciaries of the estate of the late Mwangi Ngatia Kamuku. Further, that on several occasions the County Land Surveyor had tried to reestablish the boundaries for the suit property but the 1st Defendant was hostile and caused a breach of the peace hence the need to have security during that exercise. The Plainti swore the adavit in support of the application and annexed a copy of the title deed issued to him on 19/8/2022. 2. The 1st Defendant swore the replying adavit in opposition to the application and averred that Section 18 (2) of the Land Registration Act clearly provided that actions and matters related to undetermined boundaries were within the mandate of the Land Registrar making this application a nonstarter. She added that the application was res judicata and that the ruling dated 22/11/2023 seeking eviction orders was dismissed by the court. Moreover, that a similar prayer was made in the application dated 11/9/2023. She maintained that the court having established ownership of the suit property and the https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13546/eng@2024-11-22 1

page 1 of 2

Plainti having executed the judgment, he ought to seek action regarding boundaries from the oce of the Land Registrar instead of moving the court. She accused the Plainti of litigating issues in instalments and subjecting her to nancial hardship due to the payment of advocate fees. In any case, she had led Nyeri Civil Appeal No. E085 of 2022 which was awaiting hearing before the Court of Appeal. She urged the court to dismiss the application. 3. The issue for determination is whether the court should grant the orders sought by the Plainti to have the surveyor granted security in the exercise to reestablish the boundaries of the suit property with a view to giving eect to the judgment of this court. He contended that in the past, the 1st Defendant was hostile and caused a breach of the peace when the surveyor attempted to go to the land. The 1st Defendant urged that a similar application had been dame before and that she had lodged an appeal against the decision of this court. 4. Looking at the ruling delivered by this court on 22/11/2023, it is clear that the reason why the court declined to grant the orders which the Plainti had sought was because of the discrepancies in the description of the land. The description of the land in the present application is the same as what appears in the judgment delivered by this court on 6/6/2022 in favour of the Plainti. The application is therefore merited. 5. The court grants prayer (b) of the application dated 24/7/2024. Each party will bear its costs for the application. DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NANYUKI THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024. K. BOR JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. T. Mbaaro holding brief for Mr. M. Mwangi for the 1st Respondent Ms. Vanessa Muiruri – Court Assistant No appearance for the Plainti and the 2nd and 3rd Defendants https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13546/eng@2024-11-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.