Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Anyoka v Mokaya & another

Anyoka v Mokaya & another (Environment & Land Case 107 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 13447 (KLR) (21 November 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13447 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NYAMIRA ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 107 OF 2021 JM KAMAU, J NOVEMBER 21, 2024 BETWEEN PRISCAH BOSIBORI PETER ANYOKA ................................................ PLAINTIFF AND CECILIA NYANGARA MOKAYA ................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT JOSEPH MOKAYA ........................................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. This is a very old matter spanning a period of over a decade. This Court delivered its Judgment in this case on 21/11/2023, exactly a year ago. The Plainti’s claim against the Defendants’ was for; a. A declaration that 1.25 acres or thereabout of that parcel of land known as Nyansiongo/ Settlement Scheme/524 and currently occupied by the Plainti including the section forcefully annexed by the Defendants in 2010/11 is her property. b. An order to issue directing the Land Registrar, Nyamira District to cancel Land Title No. Nyansiongo/Settlement Scheme/524 and issue the Plainti with a separate Title for her portion of the suit property. c. An order to issue directing the 2nd Defendant to pay the Plainti Kshs. 37,200/= being Special Damages for trespassing into and damaging the Plainti’s entire maize crop. d. An order to issue directing the 2nd Defendant to pay the Plainti General Damages for trespass on her portion of land parcel No. Nyansiongo/Settlement Scheme/524. e. An order to issue directing the Defendants jointly and severally to pay mesne prots for preventing the Plainti from putting to use a section of her parcel of land. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13447/eng@2024-11-21 1

page 1 of 3

2. 3. f. An order to issue directing the Defendants to pay the Plainti all monies received from KP & L CO. LTD as compensation for erecting an electric power line over her land. g. A permanent injunction to issue barring the Defendants, their Agents, Employees, Servants, personal representatives or whosoever from ever trespassing into the Plainti’s portion of Nyansiongo/Settlement Scheme/524 or in any way interfering with her peaceful occupation, enjoyment and access to said portion. h. Costs of the suit and interest thereon from the date of ling suit till payment in full. i. Other and better relief which the Honourable Court may deem just to grant in the circumstances. The Judgment of the Court was as follows; 1. The Land Registrar, Nyamira do ascertain the land belongs to the Plainti on the ground and le a Report in court showing the dimensions and delimitations of each of the Plainti’s land Nyansiongo Settlement Scheme/523 before issuing her with a Title Deed to the same since it is clear that she bought land from the person who sold part of the land to the 1st Defendant but who did not transfer the land to the plainti. 2. The land registrar and county surveyor, Nyamira do visit the parcel of land known as Nyansiongo Settlement Scheme/523 on a date to be communicated to the Plainti for purposes of ascertaining the boundary of the said parcel of land. 3. A report attaching a sketch map a RIM to be led in court within the next 45 days from the date of this judgment. 4. There are no orders as to costs since this is a family dispute. Pursuant to the above order and particularly that the land Registrar do visit the parcel of land known as Nyansiongo Settlement Scheme/523 on a date to be communicated to the Plainti for purposes of ascertaining the boundary of the suit parcel of land and that the said 2 Government ocials do le in Court a Report attaching the R.I.M. within 45 days of the Judgment, the Land Registrar did le a Report albeit belatedly on 16/1/2024. The Land Registrar, Mr. Martin M. Osano concluded the exercise on 10/7/2024 having given all the parties Notice of the same. He also carried with him the Registry Index Map. The Land Registrar concluded his 3 paragraphs Report as follows;‘‘…..the surveyor after picking the points on the ground, using the Registry Index Map and guidance from the parties to this suit. Land parcel number Nyansiongo Settlement Scheme/523 ……………..found to be measuring 1.08 Hectares on the ground which the Green Card indicates the same to be 1.01Hecrares………..parties were advised of our ndings and we left the ground after the exercise.’’ 4. I then asked the parties to le their comments on the Report. Although the Plainti in her written comments dated 11/10/2024 urges this court to make another order for the taking of the measurements in respect of the portion of land occupied by the Plainti and thereafter issue her with a Title Deed in respect of the portion of land occupied by the said Plainti, I am afraid this Court is now functus ocio. The Court must abide by its Judgment and what remains now is for the Land Registrar to issue the Plainti with a Title Deed to the said parcel of land. It is so ordered. RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYAMIRA THIS 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13447/eng@2024-11-21 2

page 2 of 3

MUGO KAMAU JUDGE In the Presence of: Court Assistant: Brenda Plainti’s Counsel: Ms. Nyakweba Defendants’ Counsel: Ms. Nyaboke https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13447/eng@2024-11-21 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.