Kanai t/a A Thuo Kanai Advocates v Talwar (Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13209 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 8 OF 2018 JA MOGENI, J NOVEMBER 14, 2024 BETWEEN ANTHONY THUO KANAI T/A A THUO KANAI ADVOCATES ... APPLICANT AND VISHISHT TALWAR ........................................................................... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. A.Thuo Kanai & Company Advocates are the Applicants in the application dated 3/08/2022. At all material times the said law rm were instructed and acted for Vishisht Talwar the Respondent/Client herein in the preparation of the Agreement for Sale where he was purchasing LR No. 152 situate in Limuru which services the applicant rendered and which gave rise to the Bill of Costs led in this matter. 2. The said rm led its Advocate-client Bill of costs which was taxed in the Respondent’s absence after the taxing ocer was satised of service to the Respondent. 3. The certicate of Taxation was served upon the Respondent’s Advocates, Zed Achoki & Company Advocates on diverse dates. 4. I have conrmed from the Deputy Registrar’s Ruling in issuing the Certicate of Taxation that the Respondent had led their submissions in response to the applicant’s submissions and having heard and considered the submissions the Deputy Registrar Hon Isabella Barasa arrived at the applicant’s advocate-client Bill of costs dated 24/01/2018 taxed at Kshs. 357.357.76. through her ruling delivered on 15/03/2021. 5. The ruling has not been appealed against nor set aside and it is the subject of the applicant’s application before this court seeking the court to adopt the Certicate as a judgment of this Honorable Court. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13209/eng@2024-11-14 1
page 1 of 2
6. The applicant, by its application which is premised on Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration Order, 2009) Order 51 Rule 1 of the CPR and all other enabling provisions of the law seeks 1. That this Honorable Court be pleased to enter judgment for the sum of Kshs 357,357.76 in costs as Certied by the Deputy Registrar on the 15th March 2021 2. That this Honorable Court be pleased to award interest on the said sum of Kshs 357,357.76 at the rate of 14% per annum from 15th February 2018 being one month after service of the fee note on the Respondent/Client specifying that interest will be charged on costs until payment of costs, pursuant to Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration ) Order, 2009. 3. That the costs of this application be provided for. 7. I am satised that the respondent’s advocate was served with this application and the hearing notice. An adavit of service dated 22/07/2024 was led and it shows that the respondent’s advocate received the same via email. The amendment introduced by Order 5 Rule 22B allows service by email thus the adavit of service is considered proof enough that service was eected, even if the person being served declines to acknowledge receipt. Rule 22B allows service by e-mail to the Defendant's last conrmed and used email address. 8. In the instant case this is the last known address for the Counsel of the Respondent. 9. There being no opposition, and the court being satised that the application is properly grounded in law, I enter judgment for the Applicant against the Respondent in terms of the certicate of taxation in the sum of Kshs. 357,357.76/= plus interest at 14% per annum from the date of the judgement until payment in full. 10. I decline to award costs of this application since it is unopposed. It is so ordered DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. …………………………… MOGENI J JUDGE In the virtual presence of: Mr. Thuo for the Applicant No appearance for the Respondent Ms. Caroline Sagina - Court Assistant. …………………………… MOGENI J JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/13209/eng@2024-11-14 2
page 2 of 2