Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Oduol v Adinda & another

Oduol v Adinda & another (Land Case Appeal E002 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 7571 (KLR) (7 November 2024) (Decree) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 7571 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT SIAYA LAND CASE APPEAL E002 OF 2023 AY KOROSS, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024 BETWEEN JOSEPH OKOTH ODUOL ...................................................................... APPELLANT AND HESBORN ODUOL ADINDA ...................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT JARED JUMA ADINDA ............................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT DECREE 1. 2. Claim for: a. That the Judgment of the Judgment Magistrate delivered by Hon. Simiyu on the 16th June 2021 be set aside. b. That an order of the disputed land be restored to the appellant forthwith c. Costs to the appellant. Upon Judgment on 14.11.2024 before Hon. Lady Justice A.Y. Koross and upon delivering the Judgment of the Court. It is hereby ordered: a. That this appeal is partly merited. b. That the judgment of the learned trial magistrate delivered on 16/6/2021 is hereby upheld. c. That the court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit. d. That the Judgment that dismissed the appellant’s case is upheld. e. That each party shall bear their respective costs in respect of the appeal. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7571/eng@2024-11-07 1

page 1 of 2

DATED AT SIAYA THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 JUSTICE A.Y. KOROSS ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT SIAYA JUDGE ISSUED UNDER MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 DEPUTY REGISTRAR ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT SIAYA https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7571/eng@2024-11-07 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.