Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

keelc-2024-07256

Mwangi & 2 others v Kariuki & 16 others (Environment & Land Case 420 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 7256 (KLR) (24 October 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 7256 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 420 OF 2018 AA OMOLLO, J OCTOBER 24, 2024 BETWEEN SARAH WACERA MWANGI ............................................................. 1ST PLAINTIFF NZILI KINGOLA ................................................................................. 2ND PLAINTIFF MICHAEL MUCHIRI ......................................................................... 3RD PLAINTIFF AND TITUS MWAI KARIUKI ................................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT ISAAC WANGOMBE ....................................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT MARY NJERI MAHINDA .............................................................. 3RD DEFENDANT JOHN KIMANI KABIRU ............................................................... 4TH DEFENDANT JOSEPH KINGOO KIEMA ............................................................. 5TH DEFENDANT SUSAN WANJIKU KIMANI .......................................................... 6TH DEFENDANT GEOFFREY MUNA KIMANI ......................................................... 7TH DEFENDANT KATUA MULI .................................................................................. 8TH DEFENDANT GEOFFREY MUNA .......................................................................... 9TH DEFENDANT VICTORIA N. MUISYO ................................................................ 10TH DEFENDANT PENINAH MUKAMI BERNARD ............................................... 11TH DEFENDANT MONICA MUKAMI GITAU ........................................................ 12TH DEFENDANT MARY AUMA NJAU ..................................................................... 13TH DEFENDANT JAMES MWANGI MUIGAI .......................................................... 14TH DEFENDANT ELIUD KARUMBA NJOROGE .................................................... 15TH DEFENDANT https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7256/eng@2024-10-24 1

page 1 of 3

JOHN KIMANI RUGURU ........................................................... 16TH DEFENDANT PAUL MUTIE ................................................................................. 17TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. This determination is in respect to the application dated 4th June, 2023 where the Sarah Wambiro sought for leave to be allowed to file her witness statement and documents out of time. She also prayed to be allowed to testify during the hearing set for 28th September, 2023. 2. The Application is premised on the afidavit sworn by Sarah Wambiro in support and on the grounds listed on its face thus; 3. a. The Applicant and one Mary Wanjiru Ndung’u jointly bought plot No. 43 Canaan Project, Nairobi from Jane Sarah Wambui on 19th July, 1996. b. The Applicant has learnt that Mary Wanjiru Ndung’u did not make a witness statement as she is deceased. c. That if leave is granted, it will not cause prejudice to the defence. The Defendants opposed the application by filing grounds of opposition dated 30th January, 2024. It listed 11 grounds of objection inter alia; a. The Applicant has not demonstrated with precision the necessity for their addition as a party to this matter. b. The Applicant’s addition as a party serves no purpose at this stage of the proceedings since both sides are already too far gone into the hearing of the main suit, other than to delay the proceedings. c. To ambush the Defendants this far into the defense of this matter will occasion a grave miscarriage of justice since this is a move that intends to blindside the Defendants. d. That to allow this addition at this stage will impact the conclusion of this matter negatively as the consequent amendment to both plaintifis and Defendants case will render all progress so far null. 4. The Applicant filed a further afidavit and deposed inter alia that the plaintifis have not closed their case. She avers the Defendants have not exactly indicated how they would be prejudiced if the application is allowed. She added that she was not aware of the death of her fellow co-owner Mary Wanjiru Ndung’u who had undertaken to follow up their interest. 5. I have considered the pleadings as filed. There is no prayer sought in the application for joinder of a new party. The Applicant is seeking to be allowed to give evidence in place of Mary Wanjiru Ndungu – deceased who she stated died before filing a written statement. The suit is as drafted is that the three people named as plaintifis have brought the suit on behalf of 23 others. 6. In the supplementary list of witness dated 10th May, 2022, and served on the Defendants counsel on 16th May, 2022, the name of the deceased appears at number 4 of the list and is indicated as the owner of plot No. 143. The Applicant has explained that they bought this plot jointly and she was not aware of the demise of her co-owner. Therefore, the Applicant is not a new party as such since the Defendant was already made aware of the plot number she is claiming. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7256/eng@2024-10-24 2

page 2 of 3

7. As the record confirms, the plaintifis have not closed their case and the Applicant in my view is a replacement of witness already stated in the pleadings. I do not see any prejudice the Defendants will sufier which cannot be remedied if the orders sought are granted. 8. Consequently, the application dated 4th June, 2023 is granted as prayed with no orders as to costs. The Applicant (Sarah Wambiro) to file and serve the statement and list of documents within 14 days hereof. The matter to be set down for further hearing. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 A. OMOLLO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/7256/eng@2024-10-24 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.