Kipkorir & another (Suing for and on Behalf of GS Self Help Group) v Tanui & 8 others (Environment & Land Case E047 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 4439 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 4439 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAKURU ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE E047 OF 2022 A OMBWAYO, J MAY 30, 2024 BETWEEN KANGOR YATICH KIPKORIR ......................................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF LENGING KIPYATOR ........................................................................ 2ND PLAINTIFF SUING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF GS SELF HELP GROUP AND WALTER TANUI .............................................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT WESLEY KIPTANUI ....................................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT TOM KIPTANUI .............................................................................. 3RD DEFENDANT KENNETH KIPTANUI ................................................................... 4TH DEFENDANT KEVIN KIPTANUI .......................................................................... 5TH DEFENDANT EDWARD CHERUTICH KIPTANUI ........................................... 6TH DEFENDANT PAULINA KABON KIPTANUI ..................................................... 7TH DEFENDANT JANE SOTI KIPTANUI ................................................................... 8TH DEFENDANT MAGDALINE TARGOK KIPTANUI ............................................ 9TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. The defendants in this matter seek orders that pending the hearing and determination of this suit a temporary Injunction be issued restraining the Plaintifi and its members by themselves, their agents, servants, employees, or anyone authorized by them and acting on their behalf from trespassing on transferring, intermeddling, advertising for the sale, disposing of, letting, leasing, further building or otherwise in any other manner interfering with or dealing with all that parcel of land known as parcels https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4439/eng@2024-05-30 1
page 1 of 2
no 1 18, 120, 121, and 122 9 and or any of their sub-divisions) in the proposed sub-division of LR No 482/5 and 482/6 measuring approximately 20 acres of Koyumtich Self-Help Group. 2. In the alternative, that this court be pleased to order that status quo be maintained in the parcel of land known as parcels no 118, 120, 121, and 122 (and or any of their sub-divisions) in the proposed sub-division of LR No 482/5 and 482/6 measuring approximately 20 acres of Koyumtich Self-Help Group in that no further sale and or disposition be undertaken with respect to the suit land and or its subdivisions. 3. The Honorable Court to be pleased to issue an order to the County Police Commander Nakuru to assist in the enforcement of the said orders. The Applicant be at liberty to apply for such further or other orders and/or directions as this Honorable Court may deem fit and just to grant. The costs of this application be provided for. 4. The application is based on grounds that the 6th Defendant is the beneficial owner of all those parcels of land known as parcels no 118, 120, 121, and 122 in the proposed sub-division of LR No 482/5 and 482/6 measuring approximately 20 acres of Koyumtich Self Help Group. 5. That the 6th Defendant entered into a sale agreement for the said parcels of land with Winnie Jebichi Boronjo and Caroline Chemtai for a purchase price of Kshs 2, 250,000/= an acre making the entire purchase price Kshs 45,000, 000/=. 6. That the said purchasers did not pay the agreed purchase price thus frustrating the transaction and the said parcel of land was subsequently sold to the Plaintifis herein who are allegedly selling and or advertising the same for sale. 7. That despite there being a pending suit on ownership of the suit properties, the Plaintifi through its members herein has commenced developments on the suit properties. That the actions of the Plaintifis herein are to prejudice the Defendants interests in the suit properties and further prejudice this suit. 8. The Plaintifi herein moved this court but instead of awaiting the outcome has proceeded to take the law into its hands to violate the rights of the defendants. The actions by the Plaintifi and its members are motivated by malice and made in bad faith and there is a need for this honorable Court to intervene. Unless the Plaintifi and its members are stopped, they will continue to interfere with the suit properties in a way that if the recover the said properties. 9. In light of the foregoing, it would serve the in interest of justice to allow the Defendants/Applicants to amend the defence. The application is made in good faith and it is in the interest of justice that the same be allowed as prayed. The supporting afidavit reiterates the grounds. 10. I have perused the afidavit on record and rival submissions and do find that there is already an order of status quo on record. Parties must fast track this matter for hearing rather than mark time on applications. I do order that the status quo on the ground and in the register of the suit properties at the land registry be maintained pending the hearing of the suit. The Deputy Registrar to visit the suit property within 15 days from today and file a status report. Hearing on 20th and 21st November 2024. RULING DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAKURU THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY 2024. A O OMBWAYO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/4439/eng@2024-05-30 2
page 2 of 2