Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Gona & another

Gona & another (Suing in the Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Samuel Kapombe Hare (Deceased)) v Indus Limited & 2 others (Land Case 11 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 22386 (KLR) (14 December 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 22386 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI LAND CASE 11 OF 2022 FM NJOROGE, J DECEMBER 14, 2023 BETWEEN DAMA KATANA GONA ..................................................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF ANTHONY UNDA CHONGO .......................................................... 2ND PLAINTIFF SUING IN THE CAPACITY AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL KAPOMBE HARE (DECEASED) AND INDUS LIMITED .............................................................................. 1ST DEFENDANT DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR KILIFI ...................................... 2ND DEFENDANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ........................................................ 3RD DEFENDANT RULING 1. This ruling is in respect of the notice of motion dated 22nd June, 2023 lodged by the 1st defendant/ Applicant. I have perused the court le found that though this court ordered on two separate sittings that the trial of the application be by way of written submissions and that the applicant do le submissions, it never complied with those orders. Consequently, the application dated 22/6/2022 is hereby dismissed for want of compliance with court orders. The matter shall be mentioned on 21/2/24. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ON THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023. MWANGI NJOROGE JUDGE, ELC, MALINDI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/22386/eng@2023-12-14 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.