Ruenji v Omwenga & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 609 of 2014) [2023] KEELC 20933 (KLR) (19 October 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20933 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 609 OF 2014 LN MBUGUA, J OCTOBER 19, 2023 BETWEEN LYDIA WANJIKU RUENJI ....................................................................... PLAINTIFF AND THOMAS OMWENGA .................................................................... 1ST DEFENDANT DANIEL SIBWORI .......................................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT FLORENCE OUMA JANGARA .................................................... 3RD DEFENDANT RULING 1. Judgment herein was delivered on 27.4.2023. The 3rd defendant has led an application dated 24.7.2023 seeking the following orders; i. Spent ii. Spent iii. That, pending he nal determination of the present application, the Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order to stay the execution of the judgment entered into against the 3rd Defendant/Applicant on 27th April, 2023 and the 3rd Defendant/applicant be granted liberty to defend the plainti’s suit. iv. That, the Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order setting aside the ex-parte Judgment entered on 27th April 2023 against the 3rd defendant/applicant, albeit, upon terms. v. That, the Costs of the application be provided for. vi. Any other relief which the Honourable Court may deem t and just to grant in the circumstances. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20933/eng@2023-10-19 1
page 1 of 2
2. The applicant contends that she was denied an opportunity to be heard as she was never served, that her counsels on record did not le a defence for no fault of hers, and that she has a plausible defence. 3. The plainti opposed the application vide her replying adavit dated 12.9.2023, averring that the applicant was properly served with the requisite documents and notices, and that the court is now functus ocio. 4. I have considered all the arguments raised herein. I nd that the reasons as to why this court denied the applicant an opportunity to defend the suit are captured in two rulings delivered on the same date of 14.2.2023. As rightly stated by the plainti, this court is now functus ocio in this matter. 5. Functus ocio is an enduring principle of law that prevents the re-opening of a matter before a court that rendered the nal decision thereon, as was stated in Brian Muchiri Waihenya v Jubilee Hauliers Ltd & another; Geminia Insurance Co. Ltd (Interested Party) [2018] eKLR, thus any adjudication on the issue ought to be taken to a higher court as was stated in SCOK case of Shollei v Judicial Service Commission & another (Application 10 (E016) of 2022) [2023] KESC 8 (KLR) (Civ) (17 February 2023) (Ruling). 6. The upshot of the ndings herein is that the application dated 24.7.2023 is found to have no merits, the same is hereby dismissed with costs to the plainti. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS. LUCY N. MBUGUA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20933/eng@2023-10-19 2
page 2 of 2