Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kilonzo v Kiige; Embakasi Ranching Co. Ltd (Interested Party)

Kilonzo v Kiige; Embakasi Ranching Co. Ltd (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E285 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 20048 (KLR) (21 September 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20048 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE E285 OF 2022 LN MBUGUA, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 BETWEEN DOMITILA MUMBUA KILONZO .......................................................... PLAINTIFF AND JOHN KAMAU KIIGE ........................................................................... DEFENDANT AND EMBAKASI RANCHING CO. LTD ....................................... INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. Before me is a notice of motion application dated 15.5.2023 in which the defendnat prays that EmbakasI Ranching Co. Ltd be joined in these proceedings as an Interested Party. He avers that the proposed Interested Party is the original owner of parcel Nairobi /Block 105/7986 and is the entity which is better placed to assist this court determine as to whether plot No. F-275B claimed by the defendant is the same plot as P2255 B claimed by the plainti. 2. The defendant avers that as per the pleadings, both the plainti and defendant claim to have purchased their plots form Embakasi Ranching. 3. The plainti has opposed the suit via a replying adavit dated 25.5.2023. She avers that Embakasi Ranching Co are the ones who transferred the suit property to her of which she was issued with a title. Thus Embakasi Ranching Co. are functus ocial in the matter. 4. I have considered all the arguments raised herein including the rival submissions. The provision of Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules permits joinder of parties whose presence is necessary for adjudication of the suit. See Moses Wachira v. Niels Bruel & 2 Others [2015] eKLR, Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v. Mumo Matemo & 5 others [2014] eKLR. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20048/eng@2023-09-21 1

page 1 of 2

5. The Embakasi Ranching Co. certainly has no stake in the suit property. However, the protagonists trace their rights and interests in the suit property from the proposed Interested Party. In the circumstances, I nd that the said proposed interested party is a necessary party to assist the court in unravelling the dispute at hand. 6. The application dated 15.5.2023 is hence allowed but cost there of shall abide the outcome of the suit. The parties are directed to amend their pleadings accordingly to include the new party. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS. LUCY N. MBUGUA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20048/eng@2023-09-21 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.