Stephen Njoroge Kahara & 2 others (Suing for and on Behalf of themselves and Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group) v Rahab Wangari Kagai & 5 others; Jeremiah Kariuki & another (Intended Interested Party)

RULING 1. This ruling is in respect of the intended interested parties application dated February 13, 2023which is expressed to be brought under Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, sections 1A, 1B, 3, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and articles 50 (1), 159(1) and (2) of the Constitution of Kenya which seeks the following prayers; 1. That the applicants/intended interested aected parties be enjoined as parties in the suit. 2. That the costs of this application be provided for in the cause. 2. The grounds on the face of the application are that the intended interested parties are some of the current oce holders of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group. That the previous ocials wrongfully transferred members properties, registered in their names and sold the said properties to other parties. That some of the previous ocials refused to hand over the group documents to the current leadership. That the self help group members have been in the dark with regard to the issues raised in the present suit. That it is fair, just and expedient that the application be allowed as prayed. 3. The application is supported by the adavit of Daniel Muriuki Githui sworn on February 13, 2023. He deposed that he is the current secretary of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group. That on November 11, 2018, the said self-help group had a general meeting where Jeremiah Kariuki Njiraini was elected as the chairperson. That it was only the 3rd plainti who maintained her position as the treasurer. That Stephen Njoroge Kahara was not the chairperson and had been masquerading as one to deceive unsuspecting parties. He reiterated that some ocials illegally transferred the members properties to their names and sold them. That some of the previous ocials included the late Peter Kagai Gathige (deceased) and Stephen Njoroge Kahara who refused to hand over the group documents to the current leadership. That they seek to be joined as parties so as to protect the interests of the members as well as their own. 4. The intended interested parties led a further adavit sworn on April 6, 2023 and led on April 12, 2023that was sworn by Daniel Muriuki Githui. 5. The said further adavit was sworn in response to the replying adavit of Stephen Njoroge Kahara that was dated March 14, 2023. 6. The said replying adavit dated March 14, 2023is not on the court record. 7. Daniel Muriuki Githui deposed that the 1st plainti alleged that he was not a member of the group which was not true. That Jeremiah Kariuki inherited his shares from his late father and took over from him which made him a member. That he was a member of the said group from the year 2003 and that his parents have never been members. That they served as ocials of the group when the 1st plainti was the chairperson of the group. That they had done various transactions with the 1st plainti and his advocates in their capacity as ocials and that it was unfortunate that the 1st plainti was trying to deceive the court. That the 1st plainti alleged that they were not ocials and allegedly attached fraudulent documents from the chief together with minutes and a letter from the social development oces which was not true. That they were indeed elected and that the members were ready to testify in that regard. That they seek to be enjoined as parties so as to protect the interests of the group as well as their own. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18818/eng@2023-07-11 2

page 2 of 4

7. The application was canvassed by way of written submissions. The intended interested parties led their submissions dated April 6, 2023on April 12, 2023. 8. They submitted on whether the applicants were the ocials of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group and whether they are entitled to the prayers sought. On the rst issue, they submitted that they are not only members of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group but they were also ocials and they have the authority to represent the group. They also submitted that the plaintis merely accused the applicants of tendering false documents but did not produce anything to support their statements. The applicants then reiterated the contents of their further adavit that they were members and ocials of the self help group. 9. On the second issue, the applicants relied on the case of Civicon Limited v Kivuwattt Limited & 2 others [2015]eKLR and submitted that they have proven their interests and the reason to be joined as parties to the suit. The applicants also submitted that they are seeking orders in the application in order to protect the interests of the members of the group and protect their interests. 10. The plaintis in their submissions dated April 25, 2023and led on April 26, 2023set out a summary of their pleadings and submitted that the applicants have not indicated in their application whether they want to be joined as plaintis, defendants or interested parties. The plaintis further submitted that the applicants could not be joined as plaintis because there was already a plaint in court and that they could also not be joined as defendants because they cannot force to be sued. Also they could not be interested parties because they have not demonstrated any interest they have on the suit property. The plaintis submitted that the applicants have not demonstrated the kind of pleadings they intend to le and relied on the case of Kenya Anti Corruption Commission v Francis Z.K Menjo & others Nakuru ELC No. 317 of 2015 in support of their arguments. Analysis and determination 11. After considering the application, further adavit and submissions, the only issue that arises for determination is whether the applicants should be joined as parties to the suit. Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules provides as follows; (2) The court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the court to be just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plainti or defendant, be struck out, and that the name of any person who ought to have been joined, whether as plainti or defendant, or whose presence before the court may be necessary in order to enable the court eectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all questions involved in the suit, be added.” 12. The applicants in the present application are seeking to be joined in this suit as parties to the suit on the grounds that they are the current oce holders of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group and have information that would shed more light on the issues brought the court. 13. It is important to point out that the plaintis in the present matter are suing for and on behalf of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group. 14. As submitted by the plaintis, the applicants have not indicated in what capacity they seek to be joined in the present suit. They have not indicated whether they would like to be joined as plaintis, defendants or as interested parties. However in their application, they have indicated that they are intended interested aected parties and it would therefore be logical to deduce that they are seeking to be joined as interested parties. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18818/eng@2023-07-11 3

page 3 of 4

15. The Supreme Court in the case of Communications Commission of Kenya & 4 others v Royal Media Services Limited & 7 others [2014] eKLR held as follows on joinder of parties as interested parties; (22) In determining whether the applicant should be admitted into these proceedings as an Interested Party we are guided by this court’s Ruling in the Mumo Matemo case where the court (at paragraphs 14 and 18) held: [An] interested party is one who has a stake in the proceedings, though he or she was not party to the cause ab initio. He or she is one who will be aected by the decision of the court when it is made, either way. Such a person feels that his or her interest will not be well articulated unless he himself or she herself appears in the proceedings, and champions his or her cause…” (23) (24) Similarly, in the case of Meme v Republic,[2004] 1 EA 124, the High Court observed that a party could be enjoined in a matter for the reasons that: (i) Joinder of a person because his presence will result in the complete settlement of all the questions involved in the proceedings; (ii) joinder to provide protection for the rights of a party who would otherwise be adversely aected in law; (iii) joinder to prevent a likely course of proliferated litigation.” We ask ourselves the following questions: (a) what is the intended interested party’s stake and relevance in the proceedings? and (b) will the intended interested party suer any prejudice if denied joinder?” 16. As pointed out before, the applicants are seeking to be joined as parties on the ground that they are now leaders of the Echariria Mwanganza Self Help Group. They have annexed an undated letter from the Chief Mbaruk Location and minutes dated November 11, 2018from Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group. For the applicants to be joined as interested parties to the suit, they have to demonstrate a stake in the proceedings and whether they will suer any prejudice if they are denied joinder. 17. As aforementioned, the plaintis are suing on behalf of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group and the applicants are also claiming to be ocials of the said self-help group which is disputed by the plaintis. It is my view that the court in considering whether the applicants can be joined in the suit has to consider whether the applicants are members of the said self-help group which is not within its jurisdiction. 18. It is my nding that other than alleging that they are ocials of Echariria Mwangaza Self Help Group, the applicants have not indicated their relevance in the proceedings and how they would be prejudiced if they are denied joinder. Consequently, the applicant’s application dated February 13, 2023lacks merit and is dismissed with costs. RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY ON THIS 11TH JULY 2023 AT NAKURU. A.O OMBWAYO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18818/eng@2023-07-11 4

page 4 of 4