Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Muindi & 2 others v Munyao

Muindi & 2 others v Munyao (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E065 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 17622 (KLR) (17 May 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 17622 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E065 OF 2021 A NYUKURI, J MAY 17, 2023 BETWEEN MUTINDA MUINDI ......................................................................... 1ST APPLICANT MUNYAO MAWEU ........................................................................... 2ND APPLICANT MUTUNGI MUTINDA ..................................................................... 3RD APPLICANT AND BONIFACE MUINDE MUNYAO ....................................................... RESPONDENT RULING Introduction 1. 2. Before court is a Notice of Motion dated November 17, 2021, led by the Applicants seeking the following orders; 1. This Honourable Court be pleased to transfer Tawa Melc Case NO. 226 of 2015 to the Environment and Land Court at Machakos for purposes of taxation. 2. Costs of this application be provided for. The application is anchored on the grounds on its face together with the adavit of Mutinda Muindi, the 1st Applicant sworn on November 17, 2021. The Applicants’ case is that Case No. Tawa MELC Case No. 226 of 2015 had initially been led before this court before being transferred to Tawa Magistrates Court due to pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction. That the said case was dismissed with costs to the Applicants. The Applicants further stated that they led a party and a party bill of costs against the respondent for assessment by the court and vide the court’s ruling dated October 7, 2021, the taxing master ruled that items 1 to 8 of the bill of costs dated October 13, 2020 be led before the Deputy Registrar Machakos High Court for taxation. He was of the opinion that no prejudice will be suered by the Respondent if the orders sought are granted. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17622/eng@2023-05-17 1

page 1 of 3

3. The application was opposed. Boniface Muinde Munyao led a replying adavit sworn on December 20, 2021. His case was that the bill of costs in issue was duly taxed in the sum of Kshs. 17,980/- which he paid in full. He conceded that items 1 to 8 of the bill of costs are to be led before the Deputy Registrar of this court for taxation. He took the position that the Applicants should le a bill of costs for items 1 to 8 before the Deputy Registrar as ordered instead of asking for transfer of the case from Tawa as no valid reason has been advanced. 4. The application was canvassed by way of written submission. On record are the Applicants’ submissions dated February 7, 2022 and the Respondent’s submissions dated March 10, 2022; both of which this court has considered. Analysis and Determination 5. I have carefully considered the application, the supporting adavit, the replying adavit and submissions. The sole issue that arise for determination is whether the le in Tawa MELC No. 226 of 2015 ought to be transferred to this court for purposes of taxation of items 1 to 8 of the bill of costs dated October 13, 2020. section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act provides for this court’s jurisdiction and inherent power to make any necessary orders for the ends of justice. 6. It is not in dispute that Tawa MELC No. 226 of 2015 was initially led in this court, but later on transferred to the Magistrates Court in Tawa. It is also not in dispute that the Applicants’ bill of costs dated 13th October 20202 was partially taxed, with the taxing master referring items 1 to 8 of the said bill for taxation by the Deputy Registrar of this court. That decision has not been set aside, reviewed or appealed against and therefore the same stands. 7. The Applicant herein has sought that the le at Tawa Law Courts be brought before this court so that the orders of the taxing ocer made on October 7, 2021 may be complied with. The Respondent argues that the Applicants can le another bill of costs without transferring the lower court le to this court. However, it is my view that the taxation of the listed items being items 1 to 8 are in respect of proceedings and matters taken in the le before Tawa Law Courts, and taxation thereof would be properly done when the same le is before the Deputy Registrar. The Respondent has not stated any prejudice that he will suer if the orders sought are granted and therefore it is my view that in the interest of justice, the Applicant deserves the orders sought. 8. However, for purposes of order and to avoid the le in issue having to be shuttled between Tawa Magistrates Court and this Court, it is my considered view that the le is brought to this court only for purposes of compliance with orders of the taxing ocer made on October 7, 2021 and upon taxation of items 1 to 8, the le shall be returned to Tawa Magistrates Court for further proceedings including execution. 9. In the premises, I allow the Notice of Motion dated 17th November 2021 and make the following orders; 10. a. That Tawa MELC Case No. 226 of 2015 be and is hereby transferred to this court for purposes of taxation of items 1 to 8 of the bill of costs dated October 13, 2020 by the Deputy Registrar of this court. b. That upon the taxation stated above the said le shall be returned to Tawa Magistrates Court for further proceedings including execution. c. The is no order as to costs. Orders accordingly. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17622/eng@2023-05-17 2

page 2 of 3

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS VIRTUALLY THIS 17TH DAY OF MAY, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS VIDEO CONFERENCING PLATFORM A. NYUKURI JUDGE In the Presence of; Mr. Mukula for Applicants Mr. Boniface Munyao the Respondent in person Ms Josephine – Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17622/eng@2023-05-17 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.