Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Water Secretary, Ministry of Water, Sanitation & Irrigation & 4 others; Home Bridge Limited (Interested Party); Tatu City Water and Sanitation (Exparte) (Judicial Review Cause 3’B’ of 2022) [2023] KEELC 924 (KLR)

Republic v Water Secretary, Ministry of Water, Sanitation & Irrigation & 4 others; Home Bridge Limited (Interested Party); Tatu City Water and Sanitation (Exparte) (Judicial Review Cause 3’B’ of 2022) [2023] KEELC 924 (KLR) (16 February 2023) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 924 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT THIKA JUDICIAL REVIEW CAUSE 3’B’ OF 2022 JG KEMEI, J FEBRUARY 16, 2023 N THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY TATU CITY WATER AND SANITATION COMPANY SEZ LIMITED FOR LEAVE TO INSTITUTE JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR ORDERS UNDER THE FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS ACT NO. 4 OF 2015 AND ORDER 53 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES, 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INFRINGEMENT OF ARTICLES 40, 47 & 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION, 2010 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE WATER ACT 2016 & WATER SERVICES REGULATIONS, 2021 AND IN THE MATTER OF LICENCE NO WASREB/LSA/FIC/72 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND WATER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WATER, SANITATION & IRRIGATION ................................................................................. 1ST RESPONDENT COUNTY EXECUTIVE, WATER, ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KIAMBU ......... 2ND RESPONDENT https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/924/eng@2023-02-16 1

page 1 of 3

WATER RESOURCES REGULATORY BOARD ....................... 3RD RESPONDENT RUIRU JUJA WATER AND SEWERAGE COMPANY LIMITED .... 4TH RESPONDENT NAIROBI CITY WATER AND SEWERAGE COMPANY LIMITED ......................................................................................... 5TH RESPONDENT AND HOME BRIDGE LIMITED ..................................................... INTERESTED PARTY AND TATU CITY WATER AND SANITATION ............................................... EX PARTE JUDGMENT 1. This court granted leave to the exparte applicant on the April 27, 2022 to bring judicial review application for orders interalia of certiorari, prohibition and against the respondents with respect to the minutes and resolutions of the meeting held in the ministry of water sanitation & irrigation on the April 5, 2022. 2. When the court retired to prepare the judgment, it became evident from the record that the applicant’s application dated the May 10, 2022 filed on the May 19, 2022 pursuant to the leave granted on the April 27, 2022 was incomplete. From the aforesaid application, I can gather that the same is based on the grounds set out in a statutory statement and verifying afidavit of Alex Kahu Kamuhia sworn on the April 22, 2022. With diligence I am unable to trace this pleading. 3. Consequently it would appear that the applicant failed to place before the court a complete application and to the extent that the statutory statement and the verifying afidavits are missing, the court is unable to determine the application in the manner in which it is, I find that the application before me is incompetent and I proceed to strike it out. 4. I make no orders as to costs. 5. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT THIKA THIS 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023 VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS. J G KEMEI JUDGE Delivered online in the presence of; Ms. Maina Sharon for Applicant 1st and 2nd Respondents – Absent Ms Chidzao for 3rd Respondent 4th Respondent – Absent Ms. Langat HB Mouti for 4th Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/924/eng@2023-02-16 2

page 2 of 3

Kyumu HB Muchemi for Interested Party Court Assistant – Esther / Kevin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/924/eng@2023-02-16 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.