Masinde v Jivraj & 4 others (Environment & Land Case 23 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 15075 (KLR) (24 November 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 15075 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT BUNGOMA ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 23 OF 2019 EC CHERONO, J NOVEMBER 24, 2022 BETWEEN ALFONSE WANJALA MASINDE ............................................................ PLAINTIFF AND ALTAF ABDULALI SHARIFF JIVRAJ ........................................... 1ST DEFENDANT NAZMUDIN ABDULALI SHARIFF ............................................. 2ND DEFENDANT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF BUNGOMA ............................... 3RD DEFENDANT CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR ........................................................... 4TH DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL .................................................................. 5TH DEFENDANT RULING 1 This Ruling arises from an objection taken by Mr. Masinde advocate for the 1st & 2nd defendants on the production of a power of Attorney contained in the plainti’s further list of documents dated 14/11/2022. The learned counsel submitted that for a foreign document to be valid, it must be attested by an authorized person but not a Notary public and after attestation, the document must be registered in the Register of power of attorney and given a special Number for purposes of identication to give it its legal validity. The learned counsel further submitted that a power of attorney should be signed by both the donor and the done signifying the power of attorney to the specic person named in the document and the Donee conrming his acceptance of the power of attorney donated to him. He further submitted that the purported document was signed by the donor on 4th February, 2020 before an advocate in Bungoma and that there is a certicate at the back showing that donor Alfonse Wanjala Masinde appeared before that advocate on 4/2/2022 after being identied by his Identity Card attested that the said Alfonse Wanjala Masinde appeared before him and was satised that he was the proper person who signed that power of attorney https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/15075/eng@2022-11-24 1
page 1 of 3
2 The learned counsel in conclusion submitted that through the pleadings on record, it has been indicated that the plainti is not available for purposes of these proceedings and no evidence has been availed indicating that the said plainti was in Kenya when the purported power of attorney was signed and attested. 3 Mr. Kituyi, counsel for the 3rd defendant associated himself with submission by Mr. Masinde , counsel for the 1st & 2nd defendants and sought to have the objection upheld. 4 The objection is strenuously opposed by Mr Sichangi advocate for the plainti who submitted that the objection is raised in bad faith and that the intention of the 1st and 2nd defendants is to derail the hearing of this case. He submitted that the plainti in this case who lives in Switzerland has donated the power of attorney in order to fast track the hearing and determination of this case. The learned counsel further submitted that the plainti works in Switzerland but the power of attorney was executed by the plainti in Bungoma county and was duly registered in the lands oce in compliance with the law. He submitted that the power of attorney is proper and the objection by the 1st and 2nd defendants is without merit. 5 I have considered the submissions by Mr. Masinde advocate and the rival submissions by Mr. Sichangi advocate for the plainti. The gist of this objection is whether the power of attorney sought to be produced by the plainti is legit and whether the current witness was properly appointed by the plainti through the contested power of attorney in accordance with the law. 6 Section 4 of the Registration of Documents Act CAP 285 provides that; ‘’All documents conferring, or purporting to confer, declare, limit or extinguish any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent to, in or over immoveable property (other than such documents as may be of a testamentary nature) and vakallas shall be registered as hereinafter prescribed—provided that, if any such document relates to land registrable under any such Act and also land not so registrable, such document shall also be registered under this Act. 7 Section 9 of the same Act provides that every document the registration whereof is compulsory shall be registered within two months after its execution and if executed outside Kenya shall be registered within two months after its arrival in Kenya. 8 Section 18 of the said Act provides that a document the registration of which is compulsory under this Act shall not, unless duly registered, be received as evidence in any transaction aecting the property to which the document relates, except with the consent of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court may impose. 9 The gist of the objection to the production of the power of attorney by the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants is that the same, being a foreign document must be attested by an authorized and not a Notary Public and after attestation, the document must be registered in the register of power of attorney and given a special number for purposes of identication. 10 I have looked at the contested power of attorney dated 4th February, 2020. The document shows that it was executed by the donor at Bungoma in the presence of Benjamin Otsiula advocate and Commissioner for Oaths. Though no ocial receipts were produced showing that the said power of attorney was registered, it was incumbent upon the Defendant to inquire or conduct a search and conrm whether the same was indeed registered or not. It is trite that he who alleges must proof. 11 The entirety of my analysis is that the objection is not merited and the same is hereby dismissed. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/15075/eng@2022-11-24 2
page 2 of 3
12 It is so ordered READ, DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN THE OPEN COURT AT BUNGOMA THIS 24TH NOVEMBER, 2022 HON. E.C CHERONO ELC JUDGE In the presence of; Mr Sichangi for plainti Mr. Kituyi for the 3rd defendant and also H/B for Mr. Masinde 4th & 5th defendants/advocate---absent Wilkister C/A https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/15075/eng@2022-11-24 3
page 3 of 3