Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Njari Mathew Mbatia t/a Matson Auctioneers & another v Kariuki & 2 others

Njari Mathew Mbatia t/a Matson Auctioneers & another v Kariuki & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 90 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 14899 (KLR) (17 November 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 14899 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT THIKA ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE 90 OF 2019 JG KEMEI, J NOVEMBER 17, 2022 BETWEEN NJARI MATHEW MBATIA T/A MATSON AUCTIONEERS ........... APPLICANT AND WAIG LIMITED .......................................................................................... PLAINTIFF AND FRANCIS KARIUKI ........................................................................ 1ST DEFENDANT JOSEPH MWAURA ......................................................................... 2ND DEFENDANT JOHN KANYI ................................................................................... 3RD DEFENDANT RULING 1. 2. The Applicant/Auctioneer led the instant Motion dated 5/4/2022 under Section 5 of the Auctioneers Rules of 1997 and Section 3 Civil Procedure Act seeking Orders That; a. Spent. b. This Honorable Court be pleased to issue an order granting the Applicant with the assistance of the ocer commanding Makongeni police station supervision in the execution of the decree given on 10th December 2020 of the demolition orders of the illegal structures erected on the suit property LR No. Thika Municipality Block 29/644. c. Costs of the Application be borne by the respondent. The Application is supported by the Adavit of even date of Njari Mathew Mbatia, a licensed Class B Auctioneer under the Auctioneers Act as evidenced by copy of his license marked NMM1. He deponed that he received a letter of instruction from the rm of M/S Kamau Kinga & Co. Advocates to execute the decree issued on 10/12/2020 - NMM2 to demolish the illegal structures on the suit property https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14899/eng@2022-11-17 1

page 1 of 2

known as LR No. Thika Municipality Block 29/644. That he had applied for and obtained similar orders which were erroneously directed to the ocer commanding station Thika police station yet the suit property lies outside the jurisdiction of Thika Police Station. That the instant Application is for correcting the said anomaly and urged the Court to grant the prayers. 3. The Application is unopposed. Supporting the Application, the Applicant’s Counsel, M/S Kamau Kinga & Co. Advocates led written submissions dated 7/6/2022 and reiterated the averments in the Supporting Adavit. 4. The main issue for determination is whether the Application merited. 5. The Court record conrms that Judgment was entered herein on 10/12/2020 in favour of the Plainti and inter alia ordered the demolition of all the illegal structures erected on the suit property. To that end a decree was extracted and the Applicant led an Application dated 28/7/2021 seeking the assistance of this Court to execute the said decree through the OCS Thika Police station. The Application was granted on 14/10/2021. 6. It is trite that Court orders are not issued in vain. It is also judicially noted that when a party is unable to execute court orders for one reason or the other, they are at liberty to approach the Court for assistance as the case herein. 7. I am satised that the Application is for allowing with no orders as to costs. The Applicant is ordered to comply fully with the provisions of Section 152G of the Land Act. 8. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT THIKA THIS 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS. J G KEMEI JUDGE Delivered online in the presence of; Ms. Waweru for Plainti 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants - Absent Court Assistant – Kevin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14899/eng@2022-11-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.