Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rombo v Ouko & another

Rombo v Ouko & another (Environment & Land Case E003 of 2022) [2022] KEELC 14560 (KLR) (3 November 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 14560 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KISUMU ENVIRONMENT & LAND CASE E003 OF 2022 E ASATI, J NOVEMBER 3, 2022 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ACQUISITION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION OF PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS KISUMU/NYAHERA/1694 AND IN THE MATTER OF LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT, CAP 22 LAWS OF KENYA BETWEEN BETWEEN JOSEPH OTIENO ROMBO ..................................................................... APPLICANT AND NORA ADHIAMBO OUKO ......................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT EMMA ANYANGO OUKO .......................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. 2. This ruling relates to the plainti’s notice of motion application dated May 11, 2022 brought pursuant to the provisions of order 5 rule 17 (1), (2) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act cap 21 Laws of Kenya. The application seeks for orders that: a. The applicant be granted leave to serve the respondents by substituted service either by way of registered post or by way of newspaper of national coverage, being either the Daily Nation Newspaper, the Standard Newspaper or the Star Newspaper. b. The costs of the application be provided for. The grounds upon which the application is brought are contained in the application and the supporting adavit sworn by Cecil Kouko Advocate on May 11, 2022. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14560/eng@2022-11-03 1

page 1 of 2

3. The applicant’s case is that upon ling the suit herein summons to enter appearance together with the plaint were released to a process server for service upon the defendants but the process server was unable to trace the defendants so as to be able to serve them with the documents as instructed. The plainti therefore seeks the aforementioned orders. 4. I have read the notice of motion, the supporting adavit. I have also read adavit of service annexed to the application sworn by one Cliord Ouko Gombe, the court process server. I am satised that there is sucient reason to order service of summons to enter appearance and pleadings so far led herein by way of substituted service. 5. In the premises, the application is allowed. Service of summons to enter appearance, the plaint and all accompanying documents and pleadings led to be eected upon the defendants by substituted service by way of registered post to the last known postal address of the defendants and by advertisement in a newspaper of national circulation to wit; either the Daily Nation Newspaper or the Standard Newspaper or the Star Newspaper in accordance with order 5 rule 17(4) Civil Procedure Rules 2010. Costs of the application to abide the suit. Orders accordingly. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU VIRTUALLY THIS 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS VIDEO CONFERENCING PLATFORM. E ASATI JUDGE In the presence of: Maureen: Court Assistant. Kouko Advocate for the applicant/plainti. N/A for the respondents. E ASATI JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2022/14560/eng@2022-11-03 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.