Esther Michuki Kaunguru v Nancy Nkuene Muthuia & another [2022] KEELC 2023 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT AT ISIOLO MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. E001 OF 2021 ESTHER MICHUKI KAUNGURU....................................APPELLANT/APPLICANT -VERSUSNANCY NKUENE MUTHUIA..............................1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT MARTIN LUBEKE.................................................2 ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING 1. This application is dated 16th December, 2021, it seeks orders: 1. THAT this Honourable Court grant leave to the Frim of M/s Otieno A & Co. Advocates to come on record for the applicant in place of M/s Kiogora Mugambi & Co. Advocates. 2. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to allow the Applicant to file an appeal out of time in respect of the Judgement/Decree of the Chief Magistrates Isiolo ELC 17 of 2016 delivered on 27/7/2021. 3. THAT this Honourbale Court be pleased to Order stay of execution of the Judgement delivered at Isiolo on 27/7/2021 herein pending the hearing and determination of this application. 4. THAT pending inter-partes hearing of the application an Order be issued for maintenance of the currently prevailing status quo in respect to plot No. 190 Kulamawe Isiolo to mean that the orders issued pursuant to the Judgment dated and delivered on 27/7/2021 respectively shall not be implemented in the Lands Office and/or on the ground 5. THAT the costs of this application be provided for. 2. The application is supported by the affidavit of Esther Michuki Kainguru, the applicant sworn on 16 th December, 2021 and has the following grounds: a) That the applicant herein instructed the firm of M/s Kiogora Mugambi & Co. to file an appeal against the judgement by the trial court. b) That the said firm failed/and or refused to file the appeal within the stipulated period as required by law. c) That this information was not privy to the applicant herein and upon realization of the same proceeded to instruct the firm of M/s Otieno A & Co. Advocates d) That actions and or inactions by counsel on record should not be meted upon the applicant. e) That the applicant has a good appeal. 3. Upon perusal of the application and its supporting documents, the following orders are issued: a) The applicant to properly serve the application within 10 days of today.

page 1 of 2