Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jesse Mutiga Laibuni v Jane Thairora & another [2022] KEELC 2017 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT AT ISIOLO ELC APPEAL NO. E002 OF 2021 JESSE MUTIGA LAIBUNI.......APPELLANT/APPLICANT -VERSUSJANE THAIRORA...................................1ST RESPONDENT HELLEN MUKIRI..................................2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. This application is dated 16th January, 2022 and seeks the following orders; 1. THAT this application be certified urgent and the same be heard ex-parte in the 1 st instance. 2. THAT there be a Stay of Execution of the judgment and decision of Hon. S. M. Mungai Chief Magistrate at Isiolo Chief Magistrates Court ELC Case No. 14 of 2017 delivered on the 8th November 2021 pending the hearing and determination of this application. 3. THAT there be a Stay of Execution of the judgment and decision of Hon. S. M. Mungai Chief Magistrate at Isiolo Chief Magistrates Court ELC Case No. 14 of 2017 delivered on the 8th November 2021 pending hearing and determination of this Appeal. 4. THAT the respondent be restrained from evicting, taking possession, using and/or in any way interfering with the ownership of Plot Nos. 1026, 1027 Kambi Ya Juu vis Plot No. 1025 Kambi ya Juu – Isiolo County pending the hearing and determination of this application. 5. THAT the Respondents be restrained from evicting, taking possession using and/or in any way interfering with the ownership of Plot Nos. 1026, 1027 Kambi Ya Juu vis Plot No. 1025 Kambi Ya Juu – Isiolo County pending the hearing and determination of this appeal. 6. THAT the costs of this application be provided for. 2. The application has the following grounds: a. THAT the Applicant/Appellant has filed an arguable appeal with probability of success against the decision of Hon. S. M Mungai Chief Magistrate at Isiolo Chief Magistrates Court ELC Case No. 14 of 2017 delivered on the 8th November 2021. b. THAT the Respondents are likely to execute against the Applicant any time pending the hearing and determination of this Appeal. c. THAT the Applicant is likely to suffer substantial loss if this application is not granted. d. THAT it is in the interest of justice and fairness that this application be allowed in default of which the applicant stands to suffer irreparably. e. THAT the Respondent’s will not suffer any prejudice if this application is allowed

page 1 of 2

3. Having perused the application and the supporting documents, I issued the following orders: a. Conditional stay of the execution of the apposite Judgment is granted in terms of prayer 2 subject to the applicant depositing with court the sum of Kshs. 400,000/= within 20 days of today FAILING WHICH the conditional stay granted herein will automatically lapse. b. The application should be properly served upon the respondents within 20 days of today. c. The application will be heard inter-partes on 14/3/2022. d. For avoidance of doubt, the applicant should serve the orders issued today upon the respondent within 10 days of today. DELIVERED IN CHAMBERS AT ISIOLO THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022 IN THE PRESENCE OF: Court Assistant: Balozi HON. JUSTICE P.M. NJOROGE ELC JUDGE, ISIOLO

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.