Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Abdi Abkulla Tari v Election Co-Coordinator Iebc Isiolo North & 3 others [2022] KEELC 723 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT ISIOLO ELC CASE NO. 012 OF 2021 ABDI ABKULLA TARI…………………………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS ELECTION CO-COORDINATOR IEBC ISIOLO NORTH & 3 OTHERS…………………………….DEFENDANTS RULING 1. The hearing date for this case was given on 7/3/2022. 2. On 7/3/2022 Advocate Caroline wambui told the court the advocate who represented the defendant was bereaved. She indicated that the defendant was willing to have the matter heard at the earliest possible date. This court gave 21/3/2022 as the hearing date. 3. On 21/3/2022 M/S Wangui who was holding brief for Mr. Mwongera told the court that Mr. Mwongera was not ready to proceed as he wanted to file a counter claim. 4. Mr. Makaka for the plaintiff protested that the hearing date was given in the presence of an advocate who represented the defendant and who indicated that the plaintiff wanted the matter heard at the earliest possible date. 5. I agree with Mr. Makaka that the defendants’ advocate should not have told the court that he sought the earliest possible hearing date. Seeking an adjournment to enable him file a counter claim during the hearing date and over 3 years since this case was filed is unreasonable and patently unconscionable Vis -a - vis the plaintiff. 6. In the circumstances, the following orders are issued; a) The hearing of the plaintiff’s case should proceed today. b) The defendants’ case will be heard on another date convenient to both parties. Written and delivered in Open Court this 21st day of March, 2022 in the presence of: Court Assistant: Balozi Makaka for the Plaintiff Miss Wangui h/b Mwongera for the defendant HON. JUSTICE P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.