Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Umeed Ali Eraj & 4 others v Balcon Housing Co. Ltd & 3 others [2021] KEELC 1892 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ELC CASE NO. 546 OF 2011 UMEED ALI ERAJ RAANA SHELDON WILLIAMS ALSO KNOWNAS RAANA FATIMA ERAJ ADEEL HAQ MARIA BERNADETTE QUADROS (Suing as legal representative of the Estate of Doctor Yusuf Ali Eraj).…PLAINTIFFS VERSUS BALCON HOUSING CO. LTD………………..…….......…………1ST DEFENDANT 1. STEPHEN NGANGA GITAU 2. SOLOMON KAGUCHIA 3. SOLOMON GAKUNJU (SUED AS OFFICIALS OF LUMUMBA DRIVE PLOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION)...............2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. This is the Notice of Motion dated 16 th June 2021 brought under Section 60 Evidence Act (Cap 80), Section 13(1) and (2) of the Environment and Land Act (No 19 of 2011), Section 1A and 1B and Section 81(3) of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Practice Directions on Electronic Case Management through Video Conferencing, Rule 6 (2) Gazette Notice No 2357. 2. It seeks orders:1. Spent. 2. That honourable court be pleased to take the evidence of the plaintiff’s witness RAANA SHELDON through video link. RAANA Sheldon is resident in London United Kingdom. 3. That honourable court be pleased to take the evidence of the plaintiff’s witness Rehana Vera Fatima Patel through video link, Rehana Vera Fatima Patel is resident in Australia. 4. That the costs of this application be in the cause. 3. The grounds are on the face of the application and are set out in paragraphs (a) to (m). 4. The application is supported by the affidavit of Rehana Vera Fatima Patel, a beneficiary of the estate of Yusuf Eraj sworn on the 25 th May 2021. 5. I have considered the Notice of Motion, the affidavits in support and the affidavits in response. I have also considered the submissions

page 1 of 2

filed on behalf of the parties. The issue for determination is whether the application is merited. 6. The emergence of Covid-19 on the year 2020 has enabled courts to be innovative in the way to conduct their business. The request by the plaintiff is not unreasonable. The reasons given are justifiable. No prejudice will be occasioned to the defendants if the plaintiffs witnesses are allowed to testify via video link. 7. I find merit in this application and the same is allowed in terms of prayers no 2 and 3 of the application. The costs be in the cause It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered in Nairobi on this 23rd day of September 2021. L. KOMINGOI JUDGE In the presence of:Mrs. Effendy for the Plaintiff Ms Wangu for Mr. Kago for the 1st Defendant Mr. Kimani for Mr. Gichachi for the 2nd Defendant Steve – Court Assistant

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.