Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kaptich Farmers Group (through Ezekiel Maritim, Joseah, Chepkosiom and Elijah Chepkwony as the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer of Kaptich Farmers Group) v Samson Maitamei Kapeen & 2 others; Hellen Koskei & 45 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 1190 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK ELC CASE NO. 4 OF 2020 KAPTICH FARMERS GROUP (Through Ezekiel Maritim, Joseah, Chepkosiom and Elijah Chepkwony as the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurerof Kaptich Farmers Group).......RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAMSON MAITAMEI KAPEEN.............................................................................................1 ST DEFENDANT JAMES KIPTENG...................................................................................................................2 ND DEFENDANT ESTATE OF NORMAN KILAKOI OLE LEPORE (DECEASED)....................................3 RD DEFENDANT AND HELLEN KOSKEI.............................................1ST APPLICANT/INTERESTED PARTIES & 45 OTHERS RULING By a Notice of Motion dated 28/7/2020 the applicant sought for orders to be enjoined in the substantive suit as 1 st to 46th interested parties. The application is based on the ground that there existed various contractual relationship between the 1 st Defendant and the Applicants/Intended Interested parties with regard to land parcel No. NAROK/CIS/MARA-OLOLOLUNGA/127 and that in the event that they are not enjoined in the suit herein. They will not be able to ventilate their claim. The applications was further supported by the Affidavit of Wesley Chepkwony, who is the third proposed interested party. He contends that the portion of the land as claimed by the plaintiffs is registered in the names of three (3) proprietors with equal shares and that one if the coowner Samson Maitamei Kapeen who is the 1st defendant sold his portion measuring 47.07 hectares to the interested parties. Individually, the applicant’s further contends that land parcel NAROK/CIS/MARA-OLOLOLUNGA/127 is no longer existence as the same was subdivided by the purchaser who are the applicants. Despite being given chance the respondents have not opposed that said application. I have considered the application before me and the submissions filed by the applicants. An interested party is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as;- “ A party who has a recognizable stake (and therefore standing) in a matter. A party who is closely connected to a law suit should be included in the case.” In the case of Communications Commission of Kenya and 4 others =vs= Royal Media Services Limited and 7 others Petition No. 15 of (2014) eKLR. The Supreme Court pronounced itself on who an Interested party is as one who has a stake in the proceedings; In the instant application by the mere fact that the Applicants claim to have purchased part of the suit land will definitely make them have a stake in the proceedings before court and are such entitled to the protection of their rights which would otherwise be adversely affected if not included as interested party. The upshot of the above is that the Notice of motion dated 28/7/2020 is merited and I will allow the same and direct that the

page 1 of 2

intended/interested party be enjoined in the suit herein as the 1 st to 46th interested parties. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT NAROK THIS 27th DAY OF OCTOBER,2021 MOHAMED N. KULLOW JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.