Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Munyua N’inoti v Nkabu Maingi & another [2020] KEELC 3631 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC CASE NO 49 OF 2003 MUNYUA N’INOTI .......................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NKABU MAINGI ................................................................1 ST DEFENDANT JULIUS MUTWIRI NKABU..............................................2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. The application before me is the notice of motion dated 1.8.19 and filed on 24.9.2019 for reinstatement of the suit which was dismissed on 12.6.17. The applicant also prays that Jane Mwari and Juster Ruguru James be enjoined in this suit as the legal representatives of the estate of 1st defendant (deceased) and that Gladys Ngari Julius and Kennedy Kinoti Mutwiri be enjoined in this suit as legal representatives of the estate of Julius Mutwiri Nkabu, the 2nd defendant now deceased. 2. The grounds in support of the application are set out on its face and on the affidavit of Munyua Munyoti. 3. I have scrutinized the issues raised by the applicants. It appears that the grants for the respective 1 st and 2nd defendants were obtained on 24.4.17 and on 27.4.17. The suit was dismissed on 12.6.19. It is hence clear that the applicant was in the process of having the defendants, substituted when the suit was dismissed. 4. I also find that the application is not opposed. In the circumstances the application dated 1/8/2019 is allowed with no orders as to costs. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 12TH FEBRUARY, 2020. IN THE PRESENCE OF:C/A: Kananu Ashaba holding brief for M. Kariuki for plaintiff Kithinji for proposed respondents Proposed respondents HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.