Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Frankline Japhet Njiru v Kenya Urban Roads Authority (Kura), Administrator Chuka Township, County Government of Tharaka Nithi, Hyper Constructions & Equipment Company Limited,Rachael Njeri Ndoho & Attorney General (Environment & Land Case 2 of 2020) [2020] KEELC 2471 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 02 OF 2020 FRANKLINE JAPHET NJIRU....................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA URBAN ROADS AUTHORITY (KURA)..........................................1 ST DEFENDANT THE ADMINISTRATOR CHUKA TOWNSHIP..............................................2 ND DEFENDANT THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI.............................3 RD DEFENDANT HYPER CONSTRUCTIONS & EQUIPMENT COMPANY LIMITED.......4TH DEFENDANT RACHAEL NJERI NDOHO..............................................................................5 TH DEFENDANT THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL..............................................6 TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. This application is dated 28th May, 2020 and is brought to court under certificate of urgency. 2. It seeks the following orders:1. That for reasons set out in the certificate of urgency herewith filed the court be pleased to certify the instant application as urgent and do issue prayer 2 and 4 herein on exparte basis. 2. That pending the hearing interpartes of this application the respondent by themselves they agent or servants or any person acting at their behest be restrained by way of interim injunction from constructing ‘’Moi Girls Road’’ or any other road within Chuka Township in as much that such construction of ‘’Moi Girls road’’ or any other road within chuka township affect Plot No.26 B Chuka Township which measures 20 feet by 120 feet. 3. That pending the hearing of the main suit herein the respondent by themselves they agent or servants or any person acting at their behest be restrain by way of interim injunction from constructing ‘’Moi Girls Road’’ or any other road within chuka township in as much that such construction of Moi Girls Road or any other road within chuka township affect Plot No.26 B Chuka Township which measures 20 feet by 120 feet. 4. That pending Interparties hearing of the instant application , the district surveyor Meru South/Maara Sub Counties be ordered by this honorable court to establish and determine the actual boundaries and perimeters of plot no .26 b vis-à-vis ‘’moi girls road ‘’ within CHUKA TOWNSHIP situated in Chuka Town and the survey be conducted as per the existing national map regarding CHUKA TOWN ROADS AND PLOTS and a report be filed in court within 30 days of this order. 5. That these orders be served upon the OCS Chuka Police Station for compliance 6. Cost of this application be provided for. 3. The application has the following grounds:-

page 1 of 3

a. The applicant is the owner of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township. b. That Plot No.26 B Chuka Township measures 20 feet by 120 feet as per the document held by the director of survey RUAKA IN NAIROBI. c. That the applicant has been paying land rates to the 2 nd and 3rd respondent without fail. d. That on 18th February 2020 D . NDERITU an agent of the 1 st respondent issued a notice that 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of plot no. 26 b chuka township be demolished. e. That the 1st respondent contention was and his that 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township is on the road reserve. f. That the applicant contention is that Plot No.26 B Chuka Township or any part there of is not on the road and or road reserve. g. The bond of contention between the applicant and respondent is therefore whether Plot No.26 B or part there of is on the road or road reserve, hence the need to call a surveyor to establish the boundaries and the parameters of plot no.26 b chuka vis-s-vis ‘’Moi Girls Road’’. h. The applicant further contends that there is a 11 meter wide space for roads but the respondent have tended to ignore this facts and insisting that plot no.26 b chuka township is on the road reserve. i. That on 4th April 2020 , the 5th and 4th respondent at the instance of the 1 st respondent demolished, damaged and destroyed 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of plot no.26 b chuka township. j. That Roma Valuers estimated the loss and damage suffered by the applicant to be ksh,2,893,170. k. That there is need to know who has between the applicant and the respondent is on the wrong and this can only be confirmed by the district surveyor. l. That the applicant has not been compensated consequently the respondent should be restrained by way of an interim injunction from constructing Moi Girls road or any other road within chuka town ship that may affect Plot No.26 B or part there of in chuka town ship. m. That the 1st respondent did not follow the law and procedure in acquiring 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township and neither did they follow the law and procedure of demolishing 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township. n. That there is need to have the actual parameters of plot no.26 b chuka township pending the hearing and determination of the main suit herein to facilitate the hearing and determination of the instant application and the main suit. o. That the orders of this court should be served upon OCS Chuka police station for compliance. 4. The application is supported by the affidavit of Franklin Japhet Njiru the applicant which states as follows: I,FRANKLIN JAPHET NJIRU OF P.O BOX 231 CHUKA in the republic of Kenya make oath and states as follows. 1. That I am the applicant herein well versed with the particulars of this suit and hence competent to make this oath. 2. That I am the owner of plot no.26 B Chuka Township(annexed and marked F.J.N 1 is the receipts for payment of land rates) 3. That Plot No.26 B Chuka Township measures 20 feet by 120 feet as per the document held by the director of survey RUAKA IN NAIROBI.(annexed and marked F.J.N 2 is the PDP). 4. That I have been paying land rates to the 2nd and 3rd respondent without fail. 5. That on 18th February 2020 D NDERITU an argent of the 1 st respondent issued a notice that 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of plot no. 26 b chuka township be demolished.(annexed and marked F.J.N 3 is the notice to demolish plot no.26 b chuka township) 6. That the 1st respondent contention was and his that 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township is on the road reserve. 7. That my contention is that plot no.26 b chuka township or any part there of is not on the road and or road reserve. 8. The bond of contention between me and respondent is therefore whether plot no.26 b or part there of is on the road or road

page 2 of 3

reserve, hence the need to call a surveyor to establish the boundaries and the parameters of plot no.26 b chuka vis-a-vis ‘’Moi Girls Road’’. 9. The I further contend that there is a 11 meter wide space for roads but the respondent have tended to ignore this facts and insisting that plot no.26 b chuka township is on the road reserve . 10. That on 4th April 2020 , the 5 th and 4th respondent at the instance of the 1 st respondent demolished, damaged and destroyed 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of plot no.26 b chuka township. 11. That Roma Valuers estimated the loss and damage suffered by the me to be ksh,2,893,170.(annexed and marked F.J.N 4 is the valuer report) 12. That there is need to know who has between me and the respondent is on the wrong and this can only be confirmed by the district surveyor. 13. That I have not been compensated consequently the respondent should be restrained by way of an interim injunction from constructing Moi Girls road or any other road within chuka town ship that may affect Plot No.26 B or part there of in chuka town ship pending the hearing and determination of the application and the main suit. 14. That the 1st respondent did not follow the law and procedure in acquiring 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township and neither did they follow the law and procedure of demolishing 20 feet by 20 feet portion part of Plot No.26 B Chuka Township. 15. That there is need to have the actual parameters established of plot no.26 b chuka township pending the hearing and determination of the instant application and the main suit herein to facilitate the hearing and determination of the instant application and the main suit. 16. That the orders of this court should be served upon OCS Chuka police station for compliance. 17. That all which is deponed herein is true to the best of my knowledge belief and information. 5. At this interlocutory stage, the following orders are issued:a. Matter certified urgent. b. Prayers 2 and 5 granted c. Interpartes hearing on 2nd June, 2020 Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 22nd day of May, 2020 in the presence of:CA: Ndegwa Hon. N. Kahara – Deputy Registrar P. M. NJOROGE, JUDGE

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.