Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

William Mutuura Kairibia & another v Inspector General of Police & 8 others [2020] KEELC 188 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC CONSTITUTION PETITION CASE NO. E002 OF 2020 IN THE MATTER OF MARIMANTI MAGISTRATES COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. 540 OF 2020 AND IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 2(1), 3(1), 10, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 48, 50, 157, 165(6) AND 245 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 50(2) ( C) AND 40 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT, CAP 284 LAWS OF KENYA BETWEEN WILLIAM MUTUURA KAIRIBIA...............................................................1 ST PETITIONER FELIX GITONGA NTHIGA MUTUURA....................................................2 ND PETITIONER VERSUS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE.......................................................1 ST RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS.............................................2 ND RESPONDENT SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE, MARIMANTI.............................3RD RESPONDENT THE COUNTY LAND REGISTRAR THARAKA NITHI COUNTY......4TH RESPONDENT THE COUNTY SURVEYOR THARAKA NITHI COUNTY......................5TH RESPONDENT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI.................................6 TH RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEYS...............................................................7 TH RESPONDENT ELIJAH MUTHURI MURIUNGI...............................................................8 TH RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER...9TH RESPONDENT RULING

page 1 of 3

1. On 16.12.2020, advocate Kabathi, for the petitioners told the court that the petitioners and the 1 st and 2nd respondents had a consent which they wanted the court to adopt as its order. The consent reads as follows: Consent Mr. Kabathi for the 1st and 2nd petitioners Mr. Momanyi for the 1st and 2nd respondents By consent That the petition be marked as settled as against the 1 st and 2nd respondents on the following terms. 1. That the proceedings in Marimanti Criminal Case No. 540 of 2020 be withdrawn under section 87 (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2. That the 1st and 2nd Respondents be removed from these proceedings. 3. There be no order as to costs. Signed by Mr. Kabathi for the petitioners Signed by Mr. Momanyi for the 1st and 2nd respondents Dated at Chuka this 16th day of December, 2020 2. Mr. Atheru, the 8th respondents’ advocate told the court that he had filed a Notice of Preliminary objection. The Notice reads as follows: NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTION TAKE NOTICE that the 8th respondent shall on 16 th December, 2020 or so soon thereafter when this suit shall come up for any hearing raise preliminary objection on points of law persuading this honourabe court to dismiss the entire suit with costs to him on the grounds that:1. The honourable court lacks jurisdiction to hear this case for being res judicata both Chuka High Court ELC Case No. 8 of 2018 (William Mutuura Kairiba –vs- Samuel Nkari, Samuel Kathiga & Daniel Mugao) and Chuka ELC Suit No. 13 of 2019 William Mutuura Kairiba – versus – Samuel Nkari, Samuel Kathiga, Daniel Mugao, Francis Ruteere & The County Government of Tharaka Nithi). 2. The honourable court lacks jurisdiction to hear this case for lack of the mandatory statutory consent to file this case by dint of section 8 of the Land Consolidation Act, Cap 283 and section 30 of the Land Adjudication Act, Cap 284 Laws of Kenya. 3. The plaintiff did not exhaust the remedies set out at sections 13, 14 and 26 of the Land Consolidation Act, Cap 283 and Section 26 and 29 of the Land Adjudication Act, Cap 284 Laws of Kenya. 4. The application dated 25.11.2020 is fatally defective. DATED AT MERU THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 SIGNED………………… FOR: THURANIRA ATHERU & CO. ADVOCATES FOR THE 8TH RESPONDENT 3. Upon hearing the parties, the following orders are issued: a)The Preliminary Objection filed by the 8th respondent and dated 15th December, 2020 be heard first with the proponent who is the 8th respondent filing and exchanging his written submissions within 21 days of today and the other parties doing so within 21 days after receipt of the 8th respondent’s submissions. b)The consent between the petitioners and the 1st and 2nd respondents dated 16.12.2020 is adopted as an order of this court. c.Interim orders extended pending interpartes hearing of the application.

page 2 of 3

d.Mention for directions on 1.2.2021. Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 16th day of December, 2020 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa Kabathi for the petitioners Momanyi for the 1st and 2nd respondents Atheru for the 8th respondent P. M. NJOROGE, JUDGE.

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.