REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI ELC CIVIL CASE NO. 1680 OF 1999 KARIOBANGI SEWAGE FARMERS SELF HELP GROUP...........PLAINTIFF =VERSUS= NAIROBI CITY COUNCIL.......................................................1 ST DEFENDANT MERAB ANYANGO POCHE...................................................2 ND DEFENDANT KARIOBANGI NORTH LIGHT INDUSTRIES JUA KALI ASSOCIATION.......................................................3 RD DEFENDANT RULING 1. I have gone through the court record. The same is clear. On the 18th December 2018, Mrs. Gulenywa for the plaintiff sought summons to be issued to the Chief Officer Lands, Nairobi City County to attend court to produce some records. Mr. Rigoro for Odhiambo for the 1 st rd defendant and Mr. Wafula for the 3 defendant were present. They told the court they had no objection to the issuance of the said sum`ons. The court then issued summons to the said Chief Officer Lands. He has come to court with records pertaining to the current status of the suit property. 2. It should be noted that this suit was filed in 1999. A lot has happened since then. The court needs to be informed of the current status of the suit property before making final orders. 3. It is in the interest of justice that I allow the witness to produce the documents. Mr. Wafula has not told the court how this will prejudice his client. I find no merit in this objection and the same is dismissed. It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered in Nairobi on this 4TH day of JULY 2019. ............................ L. KOMINGOI JUDGE In the presence of:Mrs Gulenywa advocate for the Plaintiff Mr. Odhiambo advocate for the 1st Defendant Mr. Wafula advocate for the 3rd defendant Kajuju - Court Assistant
Original judgment
Kariobangi Sewage Farmers Self Help Group v Nairobi City Council & 2 others [2019] KEELC 2255 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.