Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mutegi Mugwetwa v County Ministry of Lands, Physical Planning Energy & ICT County Government of Tharaka Nithi & 4 others; Chuka Igambang’ombe Development Association (Interested Party) [2019] KEELC 1728 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 215 OF 2017 FORMERLY MERU ELC. 08 OF 2015 FORMERLY EMBU ELC. 266 OF 2015 MUTEGI MUGWETWA.......................................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS COUNTY MINISTRY OF LANDS, PHYSICAL PLANNING ENERGY & ICT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI.................1ST DEFENDANT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI DIRECTOR GENERAL....2ND DEFENDANT THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (KENYA URBAN RURAL AUTHORITY)..........3RD DEFENDANT KENYA URBAN ROADS AUTHORITY..................................................................4 TH DEFENDANT THE REGIONAL MANAGER-UPPER EASTERN (KENYA URBAN ROADS AUTHORITY) ..............................................................5 TH DEFENDANT TERRITORIAL WORKS (K) LTD...........................................................................6 TH DEFENDANT AND CHUKA IGAMBANG’OMBE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION – INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. This court has been urged by Mr. Murango Mwenda for the 1st and 2nd defendants, who is also holding brief for M/s Kungu for the 3 rd, 4th and 5th defendants and for Mr. Rono for the Interested party, to expunge the plaintiff’s submissions from the court’s record for having been filed 4 months after the deadline given by the court and in flagrant violation of court orders. 2. Mr. Murimi, for the plaintiff, told the court that his office had been broken into and this unfortunate occurrence contributed to the delay in filing of the plaintiff’s submissions. 3. The court notes that this is the 2 nd time the plaintiff had failed to file his submissions as directed by the court. On 1st April, 2019, he was directed to file and serve his submissions within 21 days. The defendants and the Interested party were to do so within 21 days of receipt of the plaintiff’s submissions. On 22nd May, 2019, the plaintiff had not filed apposite submissions. As a result, the other parties could not file their submissions. Cumulatively, therefore, the plaintiff has caused a delay of close to six months.

page 1 of 2

4. I have carefully considered the oral application by Mr. Murango Mwenda, who today represents the defendants and the Interested Party. Having taken into account that this suit has been conclusively heard and in the interest of justice, I am constrained to deem the plaintiff’s submissions as having been filed in court. I opine that though submissions are useful in that they highlight apposite issues, including legal principles, courts of law make Judgments in accordance with the evidence tendered by the parties. 5. I direct the defendants and the Interested Party to file their written submissions within 14 days of today. 6. The parties are directed to come to court for directions, by consent, on 7th October, 2019 and to ensure that they have filed copies of their written submissions. 7. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 23rd day of September, 2019 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa Murimi for the Plaintiff Murango Mwenda for the 1st and 2nd defendants Murango Mwenda h/b for the 3rd, 4th and 5th defendants and for the Interested Party. P. M .NJOROGE, JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.