Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Razaro M’amai M’rukunga v Sabera Nkina [2019] KEELC 1632 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC CASE NO. 160 OF 2014 RAZARO M’AMAI M’RUKUNGA ................................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VERSUS SABERA NKINA ........................................................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING 1. This suit was dismissed on 7.5.2018 for want of prosecution triggering the filing of the application dated 25.5.2018 where plaintiff seeks the reinstatement of the suit. Plaintiff avers that he is interested in the case. He explains that on the date matter was listed for notice to show cause, his advocate was abruptly called to another court. Somehow the counsel who was left to hold brief did not manage to address the court. 2. The respondent has opposed the application via her replying affidavit. She avers that plaintiff has not taken any steps for a period of 3 years to prosecute the suit prior to the suit being dismissed. She also avers that Mr. Ayub Anampiu, the counsel who was allegedly holding brief for Mr. Rimita, advocate for applicant has not sworn any affidavit to state what actually happened on 7.5.2018 and that the firm of Mr. Rimita has more than 3 advocates. 3. I have considered all the arguments raised herein as well as the submissions of the parties. Indeed there is no plausible explanation as to why no steps were taken to prosecute the case for a period of 3 or so years. However, I have considered the promptness with which this application was brought forth. The suit was dismissed on 7.5.2018 and in less than a month, plaintiff had filed the present application. 4. Even though this court has been keen to clear the backlog of cases in this station, I must consider the circumstances of each case. This particular case was filed in 2014 October so it was about 3 ½ years old by the time of dismissal. It was certainly not in the category of the very old cases in this station. Considering that applicant appears vigilant, I am inclined to grant him another opportunity to prosecute his case. 5. The application dated 25.5.2018 is hence allowed but with costs to respondent. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS 25 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 IN THE PRESENCE OF:C/A: Kananu Mbogo holding brief for Rimita for applicant Gitonga JGH holding brief for Ndubi for respondent Applicant HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.