Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Japhether Wamalwa Kilui & 8 others v Mathew Munyole Wafula & another [2018] KEELC 3872 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA. CIVIL SUIT NO. 113 OF 2002. JAPHETHER WAMALWA KILUI……..…………………….....1ST PLAINTIFF JOHN SIEBELA MUSEE……………………………………...2ND PLAINTIFF JOHNSON WANJALA MAFULA……………………….........3RD PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY MASINDE SINDANI…......…………………….......4TH PLAINTIFF MARY WASIKE…………………………………………….....5TH PLAINTIFF FRAGNEL WAWIRE MIRIMO…………………....………......6TH PLAINTIFF HENRY MASIBO………………………………………….......7TH PLAINTIFF NICOLAS MASIKA MAIKUMA……..……………………….8TH PLAINTIFF TITUS MUSUYA SAKWA…………...……………….......…..9TH PLAINTIFF VERSUS. MATHEW MUNYOLE WAFULA…………………….........1ST DEFENDANT BEN MACHABE WAFULA…………………………….....2ND DEFENDANT RULING. [1] Having perused the Motion filed herein pursuant to order 40 rule 3(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules and equally having perused the supporting affidavit of Japhter Wamalwa Kilui and Johnstone Wanjala Mafuta sworn on 16/11/2017 and also having perused the replying affidavit of Mathew Munyole Wafula, I find that he has not complied with the orders of this Court of 8/3/2011. I do order that a Warrant of Arrest should issue against Mathew Munyole Wafula and Ben Machabe Wafula to be brought to this court to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt of court as by Law provided. Ruling read in the presence of Mr. Murunga. Dated at Bungoma this 28th day of March, 2018. S. MUKUNYA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE. In the presence of: Joy: Court Assistant Mr. Murunga for Khakula for the respondent/applicant Respondent is absent

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.