Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Minister of Lands, Housing, Physical Planning & Settlement & 4 others Ex-Parte Gilbert Muchiri Ngaine [2018] KEELC 3841 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA CHUKA ELC JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2018 REPUBLIC......................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS MINISTER OF LANDS, HOUSING, PHYSICAL PLANNING & SETTLEMENT....................1ST RESPONDENT DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEME OFFICER MERU SOUTH/MAARA SUB COUNTY......2ND RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL.............3RD RESPONDENT MUTUA MUGAMBI AREWA......................................INTERESTED PARTY WERU TEA FACTORY COMPANY LIMITED...........................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY GILBERT MUCHIRI NGAINE...............................EX-PARTE APPLICANT RULING 1. This application is dated 29th March, 2018 and seeks orders: 1. That the court be pleased to grant leave to the ex-parte applicant to amend the 1 st respondent’s name to read CABINET SECRETARY OF LANDS AND PHYSICAL PLANNING instead of MINISTER OF LANDS, HOUSING, PHYSICAL PLANNING AND SETTLEMENT. 2. That if prayer 1 is granted the alteration be effected accordingly in the ex-parte applicant’s pleadings. 3. Costs of this application be provided for. 2. The application is supported by the affidavit of GILBERT MUCHIRI NGAINE and has the following grounds: a) That the findings, ruling and judgment of ABRAHAM KEMBOI delivered on 16th November, 2017 by ABRAHAM KEMBOI was delivered for and on behalf of the MINISTER OF LANDS, HOUSING, PHYSICAL PLANNING AND SETTLEMENT as he was then referred. b) That after the 2010 constitution the ministers changed their titles to cabinet secretaries. c) That inadvertently the ex-parte applicant named the cabinet secretary for LANDS AND PHYSICAL PLANNING as the MINISTER OF LANDS, HOUSING, PHYSICAL PLANNNG AND SETTLEMENT.

page 1 of 2

d) That the mistake was inadvertent and it amounted to a misjoinder of a party which can be cured by order 1 rule 9 and 10 of the civil procedure rules either on application or on the court’s own motion. e) That this is a technicality that can be cured by article 159 (2) (d) of the constitution which provides that justice shall be administered without undue regard to procedural technicalities. f) That no party stands to suffer any prejudice if the orders sought are granted. g) That the orders sought are necessary if the real parties and facts are to be brought before the court for proper adjudication and administration of justice. 3. During interpartes hearing on 17.4.2018, it transpired that the application was not opposed. 4. I note that the application seeks to substitute the Minister with the Cabinet Secretary in accordance with the dispensation spawned by the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. 5. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. 6. Costs shall be in the cause. 7. It is so ordered. Delivered in open court at Chuka this 17th day of April, 2018 in the presence of: CA: Ndegwa I.C. Mugo for the Exparte Applicant Muriithi for 2nd Interested party P.M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.