Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Charles Kiunga M’mboroki (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of M’kiunga M’mbogori – Deceased) v Meru University of Science and Technology & 3 others [2018] KEELC 1673 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU ELC PETITION NO. 22 OF 2013 CHARLES KIUNGA M’MBOROKI (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of M’Kiunga M’Mbogori – deceased)..................PETITIONER VERSUS MERU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY........................1ST RESPONDENT NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF KENYA................2ND RESPONDENT LAND ADJUDICAITON OFFICER, URINGU 1 ADJUDICATON SECTION.............3RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL.......................................4TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. This ruling is in respect of the application dated 23.7.2018 whereby applicant/ petitioners are seeking for the setting aside of the orders given on 27.6.2018 where the court directed that the matter be heard by way of written submissions. 2. Applicants desire that the case be heard by way of oral evidence whereby witnesses will be cross examined on their statements and documents filed. 3. I find that this application was made before Judge Njoroge (albeit orally) on 27.6. 2018. A ruling to that effect was given whereby it was ruled that “The petition is brought on the basis that certain provisions of the constitution have been violated. I believe that it is possible to demonstrate this by way of affidavit evidence and submissions”. 4. I am therefore in agreement with the respondent’s averments that the issue is spent. 5. It is also not lost to this court that after the ruling of the court on 27.6.2018, counsel for applicant (petitioners) prayed for leave to introduce their documents by way of an affidavit. The court granted them their wish. The further affidavit of the petitioners was to be filed with submissions within 30 days. The applicants did not comply with these directions. Instead they have resulted to filing the present application four and a half years since the time of filing of this suit (on November 2013). 6. I find that the application is not merited. The same is dismissed with costs to respondents. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MERU THIS DAY OF 4TH OCTOBER, 2018 IN THE PRESENCE OF:-

page 1 of 2

C/A: Janet/Galgalo Kiogora holding brief for C.P Mbaabu for petitioners Nyamu Nyaga for 1st respondent Marete for 2nd respondent HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA ELC JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.