keelc-2018-01447

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KITALE LAND CASE NO. 157 OF 2017 ENOS ANGOYA LWUGI......................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NICHOLAS MWALE LUMEZANI..........................................1 ST DEFENDANT ISAAC WEPUKHULU FUCHAKA ........................................2ND DEFENDANT JUDGEMENT 1. In the plaint dated 25/9/2017, the Plaintiff prays for judgement against the Defendants jointly and severally for: (i) An order of eviction of the Defendants from Title No. Kitale Municipality Block 17/Bidii /611 measuring 0.586 hectares. (ii) Costs. (iii) Interest on the costs. (iv) Any other relief this Honorable Court may deem fit to grant. 2. According to the plaint the plaintiff’s case is that he is the proprietor of LR No. Kitale Municipality Block 7/Bidii/611 measuring 0.586 Ha or thereabouts. He sold the land to the defendant on or about 20/3/2008 for Kshs. 530,000/= and the defendant paid Kshs. 427,200/= thereof leaving a balance of Kshs. 102, 800/= which sum was to be paid within one month from that date. The plaintiff avers that the defendant failed to honour the second instalment and no consent of the Land Control Board was obtained. The 1 st defendant thereafter purportedly sold the land to the 2nd defendant. It is the plaintiff’s case that the 1 st defendant did not have any valid title to pass on to the 2 nd defendant and that both are now trespassers owing to the breach of agreement by the 1 st defendant. 3. The 1st defendant filed his defence on 21/11/2017 in which he has denied that the plaintiff is the owner of the land. He further avers that there was a verbal agreement that the plaintiff would execute the transfer in his favour before being paid the balance which the plaintiff had failed to do. He denies ever being served with any demand letter. 4. The 2nd defendant, though served as demonstrated in the affidavit of service dated 14/11/2017, failed to enter appearance or file defence. 5. The 1st defendant was served with the hearing notice for the hearing scheduled for 12/7/2018. The suit proceeded to formal proof on the 12/7/2018 when the plaintiff testified as PW1 in the absence of both defendants. The plaintiff produced the original title deed for LR No. Kitale Municipality Block 7/Bidii/611. It shows that the land is registered in his name and it measures 0.586 Ha. He also produced a copy of a written agreement dated 20/3/2008 between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant and a letter of demand dated 8/2/2014. 6. The plaintiff filed his submissions on 29/8/2018. The defendants never filed any submissions in this suit. 7. In the light of the contents of the plaintiff’s written statement, his oral evidence, the documents produced at the hearing, the nature of the defence of the 1st defendant and the want of defence on the part of the 2 nd defendant, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has established that : he owns the land, that there was a sale agreement between him and the 1 st defendant; that the sale agreement failed due to default on the part of the 1st defendant and that the 1st defendant has purported to give the land by unclear means to the 2 nd defendant. The 1st defendant has failed to come to court to give evidence on his defence. Accordingly I find that he has no right to the land owing to the breach of the agreement dated 20/3/2008.

page 1 of 2